Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 16;3(4):1435–1445. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz106

Table 3.

F-values and P-values from tests of significance for daily activity and rumination1

Organic herd Conventional herd
Daily activity Daily rumination Daily activity Daily rumination
Independent variables2 Num df F-value P-value Num df F-value P-value Num
df
F-value P-value Num
df
F-value P-value
Breed group 3 0.68 0.56 3 3.8 0.01 3 0.65 0.58 3 3.7 0.01
Month 11 4775.1 0.001 11 1108.8 0.001 11 5468.5 0.001 11 162.0 0.001
Year 3 172.5 0.001 3 8.0 0.001 3 567.2 0.001 3 202.0 0.001
Parity group 1 482.5 0.001 1 5.8 0.02 1 664.5 0.001 1 288.3 0.001
Breed group by year 9 80.8 0.001 9 21.8 0.001 9 57.0 0.001 9 12.0 0.001
Breed group by parity group 3 467.5 0.001 3 16.3 0.001 3 177.9 0.001 3 7.4 0.001
Parity group by year 3 113.5 0.001 3 25.8 0.001 3 192.1 0.001 3 61.3 0.001

1Activity and rumination were recorded by HR-LD Tag (SCR Engineers Ltd) with a 3-axis accelerometer and a microphone.

2Herd = organic or conventional; Month = January to December; Year = 2014 to 2017; Breed group = contemporary Holstein, 1964 Holstein, crossbreds sired by Montbéliarde, Viking Red, Holstein, Normande and Jersey; Parity group = primiparous or multiparous.