Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 23;2(2):144–155. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy010

Table 10.

Effects of fish meal source on nursery growth performance, experiment 11

Fish meal source2
Item Control ESBM3 1 2 3 SEM Probability, P
Body weight, kg
 Day 0 7.06 7.07 7.06 7.06 7.06 0.057 <1.000
 Day 13 10.45 10.27 10.30 10.46 10.55 0.181 <0.791
Day 0–13
 ADG, g 261 247 249 262 269 11.6 <0.652
 ADFI, g 370 342 388 361 367 16.4 <0.406
 G:F 0.720x 0.732x 0.657y 0.730x 0.743x 0.0221 <0.068

1A total of 250 pigs (327 × 1,050 PIC, Hendersonville, TN; initially 7.1 kg body weight) were used in a 13-d growth trial with five pigs per pen and 10 replications per treatment.

2HP 300 (Hamlet Protein, Findlay, OH).

3Fish meal source 1 (IPC 790) was from The Scoular Company (Minneapolis, MN); source 2 (Omega Special Select Menhaden) was from Omega Protein (Houston, TX); and source 3 (LT Prime Menhaden) was from Daybrook Fisheries, Inc. (New Orleans, LA).

xyWithin the a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.10).