Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 23;2(2):144–155. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy010

Table 11.

Effects of fish meal source and level on nursery growth performance, experiment 21

Item Control Fish meal source2 Probability, P
1 2 3 Source × level
3% 6% 3% 6% 3% 6% SEM Linear Quadratic
Body weight3, kg
 Day 0 6.49 6.51 6.49 6.50 6.49 6.51 6.50 0.091 <0.996 <0.998
 Day 14 10.07 10.23 10.52 10.40 9.87 10.26 10.19 0.176 <0.039 <0.207
Day 0–14
 ADG3, g 255 266 288 277 238 268 264 10.5 <0.006 <0.110
 ADFI3, g 329 344 354 349 330 332 335 11.3 <0.303 <0.493
 G:F3 0.774 0.777 0.811 0.793 0.725 0.808 0.790 0.0201 <0.010 <0.171

1A total of 350 maternal line barrows (200 × 400 DNA, Columbus, NE; initially 6.5 kg body weight) with five pigs per pen and 10 replications per treatment were used in a 14-d growth trial.

2Source 1 (IPC 790) was from The Scoular Company (Minneapolis, MN); source 2 (Omega Special Select Menhaden) was from Omega Protein (Houston, TX); and source 3 (LT Prime Menhaden) was from Daybrook Fisheries, Inc. (New Orleans, LA). All fish meal sources were from the 2014 catch year.

3No evidence of significant main effects of source or level (P > 0.10).