Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;3(4):1112–1118. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz053

Table 4.

Effect of direct-fed microbial on erythrocytes

Treatment SP, month Erythrocytes
Hb, g/dl RBC, 106/μL PCV, % MCV, µm3 MCH, pg MCHC, %
Reference range1 9–15 9–15 27–45 28–40 8–12 31–34
Control 10.05 7.60 29.21 39.30 13.57 34.84
RE3 10.64 7.95 30.00 37.71 13.61 36.35
RE3 Plus 10.63 8.13 29.95 36.18 13.06 36.12
P3 10.56 7.83 29.65 37.53 13.25 33.94
SE 0.69 0.31 1.48 1.96 0.75 1.40
1 11.49a 8.14b 30.55b 37.47 14.20 36.77a
2 11.20a 8.93a 33.60a 37.85 12.68 33.40b
3 7.86b 5.71c 20.67c 37.54 13.93 37.67a
4 11.33a 8.72a 34.00a 37.85 12.68 33.40b
SE 0.66 0.31 1.50 2.03 0.73 1.38
Statistical interaction
Control*sp **** **** **** **** **** ****
RE3*sp **** **** **** **** **** ****
RE3 Plus*sp **** **** **** **** **** ****
P3*sp **** **** **** **** **** ****

Means with the common letter within treatments and sampling periods (SP) are not significantly different based on comparison of least squares means within PROC MIXED of SAS. ****P < 0.0001.

1Source: Aiello (2000).