Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;3(4):1112–1118. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz053

Table 5.

Effect of direct-fed microbial on leucocytes

Leucocytes
Treatment SP, month NEUT, % EOSIN, % MONO, % LYMPH, % BASO, %
Reference range1 10–50 0–10 0–6 40–75 0–3
Control 46.94a 11.83 5.22b 35.89 0.11
RE3 45.69ab 12.24 6.90a 34.46 0.25
RE3 Plus 43.80b 14.00 5.64b 36.10 0.13
P3 47.07a 11.94 5.37b 35.24 0.07
SE 1.46 1.74 0.65 1.63 0.14
1 46.50 9.78b 5.40b 37.94a 0.11
2 44.74 17.35a 6.83a 30.65b 0.15
3 46.40 10.34b 5.12b 37.68a 0.15
SE 1.27 1.49 0.53 1.39 0.12
Statistical interaction
Control*sp **** **** **** **** ****
RE3*sp **** **** **** **** ****
RE3 Plus*sp **** **** **** **** ****
P3*sp **** **** **** **** ****

Means with the common letter within treatment and sampling periods (SP) are not significantly different based on comparison of least squares means within PROC MIXED of SAS. ****P < 0.0001.

NEUT, neutrophils; EOSIN, eosinophils; MONO, monocytes; LYMPH, lymphocytes; BASO, basophils.

1Source: Aiello (2000).