Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 May 5;10:7589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63462-1

Observation of grating diffraction radiation at the KEK LUCX facility

A Aryshev 1,✉,#, A P Potylitsyn 2,✉,#, G A Naumenko 2, M Shevelev 2, D Shkitov 2, L G Sukhikh 2, N Terunuma 1, J Urakawa 1
PMCID: PMC7200665  PMID: 32372064

Abstract

The development of linac–based narrow–band THz sources with sub–picosecond, μJ-level radiation pulses is in demand from the scientific community. Intrinsically monochromatic emitters such as coherent Smith–Purcell radiation sources appear as natural candidates. However, the lack of broad spectral tunability continues to stimulate active research in this field. We hereby present the first experimental investigation of coherent grating diffraction radiation (GDR), for which comparable radiation intensity with central frequency fine–tuning in a much wider spectral range has been confirmed. Additionally, the approach allows for bandwidth selection at the same central frequency. The experimental validation of performance included the basic spectral, spatial and polarization properties. The discussion of the comparison between GDR intensity and other coherent radiation sources is also presented. These results further strengthen the foundation for the design of a tabletop wide–range tunable quasi–monochromatic or multi–colour radiation source in the GHz–THz frequency range.

Subject terms: Experimental particle physics, Experimental particle physics, Terahertz optics, Terahertz optics

Introduction

Various applications of THz radiation demand a high–brilliance monochromatic source with tunable characteristics such as spectral range, pulse duration, polarization, and directivity14. Semi–conventional linac–based THz sources can provide sub-picosecond radiation pulses at approximately the hundred nJ-level with a continuous spectrum up to 1 THz59. However, in many applied investigations, narrow–band sources at this energy level are desired1014. Evidently, to achieve this objective, the usage of a monochromator is required. However, approaches offering more output energy are related to the utilization of sources based on radiation mechanisms which are intrinsically monochromatic; for instance, coherent Smith-Purcell radiation (SPR)15 or coherent Cherenkov radiation from dielectric lined waveguides16. Typically, spectral line fine-tuning of SPR-based sources is performed by output photon angular selection, i.e., by detection aperture positioning17 or by the rotation of an additional mirror upon parallel passage of an electron beam near a grating18. Superior spectral tuning can only be accomplished by the replacement of the grating with another having a different profile or period19. In the refs. 20,21 initial proposals to use non–parallel orientation of a grating relative to a beam to change the frequency of the SPR spectral lines for a given outgoing photon angle were presented. In this case, the position of the collimator or aperture, which provided the radiation beam spectral acceptance, was fixed. Moreover, in ref. 20 the generalized dispersion relation for the inclined grating was obtained as:

λ=dk(cosηβcos(θη)), 1

where λ is the radiation wavelength, d is the grating period, k is the diffraction order, β is the electron velocity in light units, η is the grating orientation angle, and θ is the observation angle. For a charge trajectory parallel to the grating (η=0) Eq. 1 coincides with the well-known SPR dispersion relation λ=dk(β1cosθ). It is important to note that Eq. 1 is also valid for larger grating orientation angles that are typically unreachable for SPR generation experiments due to the longitudinal grating dimensions and the small distance to the electron beam. However, implementation of large angle radiation emission may be considered in a “diffraction radiation”–like arrangement. This should lead to different radiation polarization maps, intensities and directivity profiles, although the approach offers wide–range monochromatic spectral tunability which still follows Eq. 1. Radiation generated in this case, by analogy with the grating transition radiation2224, also has significant spectral tunability but without the drawback of the destructive interaction of the electron beam with the grating material. This radiation is referred to as the “grating diffraction radiation” (GDR).

In this report, we demonstrate the first experimental observation of coherent GDR which includes the investigation of the basic spectral, spatial and polarization properties in addition to a discussion on GDR intensity in comparison with coherent SPR and coherent diffraction radiation (CDR). The result improves the prospects of designing a tabletop wide–range tunable quasi–monochromatic or multi–colour radiation source in the GHz–THz frequency range.

Results

Details of the experimental geometry are illustrated in Fig. 1. The Coulomb field of the relativistic charge with the effective radius γλ (γ is the Lorentz-factor and λ is the radiation wavelength) interacts with a tilted periodic structure on the length Leff=2γλ/sinη for η>ηc=arcsin[2γλ/L0] and on the length Leff=L0 if ηηc, assuming the axis of rotation in the center of the grating and hh<γλ, where L0 is the grating length and hh is the horizontal impact-parameter. If the relation Neff=Leff/d1 is satisfied, one can expect that the resulting radiation would become quasi-monochromatic and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) bandwidth can be estimated as25:

Δλ/λ=0.89/kNeff=0.89dsinη/2kγλ. 2

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematics of the experimental layout (a) and grating geometry (b,c). Abbreviations: M1 - fixed interferometer mirror, M2 - movable mirror, BS - beam splitter, PM - parabolic mirror with a focal length of 152 mm, L0 - grating length, Leff - interaction length, hv - vertical impact-parameter, hh - horizontal impact-parameter, η - grating inclination angle, θ - observation angle, d - grating period, ☉ - grating rotation axis in XZ plane.

The monochromaticity estimation from the above–given equation is valid only for a small capture angle of the detection system Δθ0.89λ/Leffsin(θη), and if the chosen grating parameters and geometry satisfy the condition N0Neff1, where N0 is the number of grating periods. The factor 0.89 comes from the Fourier transform of the periodical function (grating periods), shaped by the rectangular window representing the finite grating length26.

In the present investigation, we measured the spectral–angular distribution and polarization properties of the radiation produced by the 8 MeV, 25 pC single electron bunch with 0.15 mm rms length passing below the 4 mm period, 30×60 mm2, N0=15, echelette profile grating (Fig. 1b,c). To reveal the actual full bandwidth of the spectrometer system Δνexp=140±1 GHz, the broadband coherent transition radiation (CTR) spectrum from the flat surface on the rear of the grating plate was measured. The CDR was generated from the same surface, but when the target’s vertical position was set to allow for the electron beam passage below the target. It is important to mention that two impact-parameters, the horizontal hh and the vertical hv (hv < 0 for the CTR and hv > 0 for the CDR), are considered as explained in the Methods section. Figure 2 shows a comparison of the typical charge–normalized auto–correlation dependencies (a-c), measured spectra (d) taken for the same observation angle θ=90 and angular acceptance of the detection system Δθ=1.6, and GDR orientation dependencies (e). As can be seen in Fig. 2d, the Schottky Barrier Diode (SBD) detector has a full bandwidth of 320460 GHz25,27 which limits the overall spectral sensitivity of the system. For a direct spectral intensity comparison, the spectrum of the coherent SPR, horizontal polarization was measured when the electron beam passed near the grating in SPR geometry: hh=0.5 mm, hv=15 mm, η=0. Then, the spectra of GDR at η=0 for both horizontal polarization (HP) and vertical polarization (VP), were acquired. As expected, the yield of GDR at η=0 is smaller than that of SPR, since only part of the beam’s Coulomb field interacts with the grating. The integration over a given spectral range gives the following radiated power in arbitrary units: SPR-HP =31.04, GDR-HP =13.94 and GDR-VP =3.94. The GDR emitted by the semi-plane grating has approximately 2.2 times less intensity than the SPR at η= 0. Nevertheless, the observed spectral properties confirm that GDR is also monochromatic and its line widths 3% for small angles η and given Δθ practically coincide with the same characteristics of SPR. For different grating orientation angles η, the GDR integral intensity of a few diffraction orders varies and reaches levels comparable to these of SPR as can be seen from the η-scans acquired in the range from 5 to 20 while keeping hv= 0.5 mm, Fig. 2e.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Zoom-in of the measured auto–correlation curves of CTR (a), SPR (b) k=5, hv=15 mm, hh=0.5 mm, and GDR horizontal polarization (c) for η=5, k=5. (d) Comparison of the CTR spectrum and SPR, GDR spectra taken for hv=0.5 mm and hh=0.5 mm. (e) GDR horizontal and vertical polarization angular distributions taken for hv=0.5 mm.

Investigation of the GDR properties on the grating orientation angle η shows wide–range spectral tunability. Different polarizations of the GDR have similar spectral content with minor variation in intensity (Fig. 3, η= 5 for both polarizations) due to the 2–wedged sapphire vacuum window and different splitting efficiency S(ω) of the 300 μm-thick silicon beam splitter used in the interferometer. The simulated dependence of S(ω)4RT, where R and T are the reflection and transmission coefficients for two linear polarizations28,29, is shown in Fig. 4,b. In the case of ideal 50% splitting S(ω)=1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Typical GDR horizontal polarization (a) and vertical polarization (b) spectra as a function of the grating orientation angle η.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

GDR spectral–angular distribution of k=36 diffraction orders calculated by Eqs. 1, 2 (a - colored bows) and measured GDR spectral peaks for both horizontal and vertical polarizations. Error-bars represent FWHM spectral line widths (a - markers). (b) Calculated efficiency of the 300 μm-thick silicon beam splitter, angle of incidence 45.

An important GDR spectral feature is that not only central frequencies can be fine–tuned by selecting the η angle, but also the spectral bandwidth for the same central frequency can be broadened by switching to lower diffraction orders at larger η. Typical frequency shifts for sequentially small η angles are shown for GDR VP in Fig. 3b and the bandwidth increase near similar central frequencies are shown for GDR HP in Fig. 3a. In the current example, the bandwidth Δλ/λ was switched from 2.8% to 10% levels. According to splitter efficiency simulation Fig. 4b, S(ω) drops to zero at 300 GHz and 450 GHz. Around these frequencies Michelson interferometer gradually loses performance, but still produces auto–correlation with reduced visibility which can be recalculated to a spectrum via Fourier transform. However, spectral amplitude in this case is decreasing and can not be directly compared with amplitudes from other regions of S(ω) dependence. The red dashed line in Fig. 3a represents the re–normalized GDR HP spectra for η=17.5 which is valid to within an amplitude factor. The renormalization means addition of inversed spectral function multiplied by inversed splitter efficiency function, as can be derived from a generalized formula of Fourier transform spectroscopy30,31. This is done only for the GDR spectrum taken at η=17.5 in the range 430–470 GHz as other spectral lines lie in non-zero regions of S(ω) dependence.

A summary of the GDR spectra measurements for both HP and VP is shown in Fig. 4a along with the GDR spectral–angular distribution for diffraction orders k=36 calculated using Eq. 1. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) spectral widths are calculated by Eq. 2. Measured data are in close agreement with the dispersion relation Eq. 1.

Discussion

It is expected that for the THz frequency range (λ0.3 mm) electrons with energy 10 MeV can generate monochromatic GDR from a grating with d0.5 mm and N050. In this case the spectral line may be tuned over a broad interval, thereby changing the grating orientation angle in the range 0<η<20 with an accuracy of Δη0.1 can result in a spectral range of 0.1–1 THz and a spectral accuracy ranging from sub-GHz to a few GHz depending on k and η. Additional spectral selection can be performed by usage of bandpass filters32 or different grating profiles33,34.

The GDR radiated energy can be estimated through comparison of the GDR and CDR experimental data while CDR yield can be analytically found. Using the notation from ref. 35 one can write the following expression for CDR HP spectral density assuming a perfectly conducting semi-plane target and neglecting the terms lower than γ2 as:

dWCDRHPdω=Ne2Δθx,Δθyd2W0HPdωdΩF(ω,θx,θy)dΩ;d2W0HPdωdΩ=α4π2exp(ωωc1+γ2θx2)θx2(γ2+θx2)(γ2+θx2+θy2) 3

Here F(ω,θx,θy)=exp((ω2/c2)(σx2θx2+σy2θy2+σz2)) is the 3D Gaussian beam form–factor, ωc=γc/2hv is the characteristic diffraction radiation frequency, ω=2πc/λ - radiation frequency, hv - vertical impact parameter, γ - Lorentz factor, α - fine-structure constant, c - speed of light, θx and θy are the projection angles between the specular reflection direction and the wave vector of the outgoing photon. Simulation of the CDR η-scans by Eq. 3 is presented in Fig. 5a - red curves which shows a reasonable agreement with the experimental data for the real electron bunch sizes and the detector angular acceptance neglecting electron beam divergence. To find the CDR HP emitted energy per bunch Eq. 3 should be integrated over the detected radiation frequency band as:

ΔWCDRHP=Ne2νminνmaxdWCDRHPdω2πdν. 4

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Measured and simulated CDR angular distributions. (b) Measured and simulated bremsstrahlung and CDR VP intensity as a function of the vertical impact parameter hv. (c) Measured and simulated coherent SPR HP intensity versus horizontal impact parameter hh.

Assuming an angular acceptance of the detection system Δθx×Δθy=4×0.02×0.02, bunch population Ne=1.56108, measured SBD detector sensitivity bandwidth Δνexp=140±1 GHz (νmin=320 GHz, νmax=460 GHz), electron bunch rms sizes in transverse and longitudinal directions σx=σy=300±2  µm and σz=150±5 µm we obtain ΔWCDRHP=120±5 pJ and, accordingly ΔWCDRHP/Δνexp=860±35 pJ/THz. The results of the GDR HP measurements (Fig. 2e) are presented in the same arbitrary units as the CDR yield (Fig. 5a). For η=5 the measured intensity of the GDR HP =0.24±0.007 is about 14.2% of the CDR HP =1.68±0.2 taken at η=223. For both cases hv=0.5 mm. The spectral intensities ratio of GDR HP k=5 (410 GHz) to k=4 (320 GHz) in this case is 2.7:1 or 73%: 27%, (Fig. 3a). Hence, the intensity of the single GDR spectral line νGDRk=5=410 GHz may be estimated as 10.4% of the ΔWCDRHP and taking into account the GDR line width (ΔνGDRk=5=15±1 GHz) one can obtain the estimation of the GDR spectral density as ΔWGDRHP/ΔνGDRk=5=832±27 pJ/THz. This means, that the intensity of a single coherent GDR line with Δν15 GHz from a train of 50 short electron bunches with a total charge Q~50×25 pC ~1.25 nC can achieve the level of 41.6 nJ/THz. Such a source of monochromatic THz radiation based on a compact electron accelerator can be considered as a promising candidate for many practical applications. The errors include statistical errors due to the fitting or rms calculation in σx, σy, νexp and systematic errors from the uncertainty in σz.

Wide–range tunability and the possibility of bandwidth selection, along with further grating and electron beam parameter optimization will lead to a much higher peak radiation power. Due to the unperturbed interaction of the electron beam with the grating, one can consider GDR applications in time-resolved THz spectroscopy experiments36, to non–invasive beam diagnostics3739 and multi–colour radiation generation40 by an array of gratings. To increase the GDR radiated power further, a slit–grating (i.e. when the electron beam is passing through a horizontal slit made in a grating) with an optimized profile should be considered.

Methods

The experiment was performed at the KEK LUCX facility41. The detailed description of the accelerator, grating, and THz interferometer can be found in ref. 25. As it was discussed in ref. 42, the Michelson interferometer is optimized for a large bandwidth of both HP (polarization in the diffraction plane) and VP of the incoming radiation excluding only 300 GHz and 450 GHz spectral lines where silicon splitter efficiency S(ω) drops to zero. The SBD detector and a 100 mm diameter wire-grid polarizer consisted of tungsten wires with diameters of 15µm and spacings of 200µm (installed in front of the SBD) were mounted to the rotation stage to allow for polarization selection during spectral measurements. All spectra (Figs. 2d and 3) were obtained by Fourier transform43,44 of the charge–normalized auto–correlation curves which were measured with an rms resolution Δν=c/2L determined by the interferometer’s movable arm travel range L=62 mm (zero–path difference point ±31 mm) as Δν/ν= < 0.8% and so are plotted with identical scales. The Michelson interferometer used in the experiment has a resolution higher than that of the natural GDR VP spectral line width determined for a point-like aperture δν/ν 0.89/kNeff1.1%, since NeffN0= 15, k= 5. However, the angular acceptance of the detection system Δθ= 1.6 limited the measured spectral line widths to 3% level. The observed anomaly of the η= 15 curve around 425 GHz in Fig. 3a suggests to perform a higher resolution study to check for a more complex spectral structure.

Initially, the interferometer was set to a zero-path difference point and a number of preliminary scans were performed in order to verify the grating angle and the position with respect to the electron beam. The CDR yield versus the angle between the electron beam and the flat side on the rear of the grating (η-scan for a large angles around η= 225) was measured for impact parameter hv= 0.5 mm, Fig. 5a. This allows the grating orientation angles η to be determined with an accuracy better than 1.

It was noted that the current experimental geometry for the investigation of the GDR properties has two impact parameters: vertical hv - the distance between the electron beam and the edge of the grating; and horizontal hh which can be defined as the distance between the electron beam and the grating main plane at η= 0, Fig. 1. For η corresponding to the maximum of CDR VP, (specular reflection direction from the flat rear side of the grating) the radiation yield dependence on the vertical impact parameter hv was obtained (Fig. 5b - green markers). The peak of the curve coincides with the target edge, the right slope corresponds to the CDR, and the left part is connected with CTR. A similar dependence for non-coherent radiation was measured in the optical wavelength range at the KEK ATF accelerator, and was discussed in ref. 45. In order to avoid direct beam interaction with the grating and to maintain a significant CDR/GDR yield, the vertical impact-parameter for further measurements was chosen as hv= 0.5 mm.

Electron beam parameter simulations46,47 show that the transverse rms bunch size at the grating location was equal to 300±2 µm. The measurements of the bremsstrahlung produced by electrons versus the vertical impact parameter hv confirm the simulation results (Fig. 5b - black markers). If the assumption is made that the transverse profile of the beam can be described by a Gaussian function (confirmed by measurements with luminescent screen installed 400 mm downstream of the experimental station) the measured dependence can be described by the function:

F(y)yexp[(y1y0)2/2σ2]dy1, 5

with free parameters y0= 33.15±0.1 mm and σ= 290±12 µm.

The horizontal impact parameter hh=0.5 mm was set in accordance with the radiation yield dependence on the horizontal distance between the electron beam and the grating in SPR geometry: η= 0, hv=15 mm, Fig. 5c. If hh is known, this allows for a comparison of yields at η= 0 for GDR and SPR to be made.

Acknowledgements

This work was performed as part of international collaboration AGTaX. The authors would like to thank S. Araki, M. Fukuda, and Y. Honda for their valuable assistance, useful discussions, and support of the LUCX accelerator operation and maintenance. The authors are also grateful to Y. Honda for the provision of SBD detector. The work was supported by the Photon and Quantum Basic Research Coordinated Development Program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology, Japan; JSPS and RFBR under the Japan-Russia Research Cooperative Program (18-52-50002 YaF _ a); the Leverhulme Trust through the International Network Grant (IN 2015012); Russian Ministry of Education and Science within the program “Nauka”, Grant No. 3.1903.2017 and the Competitiveness enhancement program of Tomsk Polytechnic University.

Author contributions

A.A. and M.S. maintained stable KEK:LUCX accelerator operation and ran experiments with L.G.S. and G.A.N.; M.S. performed the electron beam dynamics simulations; D.Sh. performed coherent radiation property simulations; A.A., A.P.P., G.A.N. and L.G.S. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. N.T. and J.U. provided management and oversight to the project. All authors commented on the manuscript and agreed on the contents.

Data availability

All data are available on request from the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: A. Aryshev and A. P. Potylitsyn.

Contributor Information

A. Aryshev, Email: alar@post.kek.jp

A. P. Potylitsyn, Email: potylitsyn@tpu.ru

References

  • 1.Tonouchi M. Cutting-edge terahertz technology. Nat. photonics. 2007;1:97–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Danielson J, et al. Interaction of strong single-cycle terahertz pulses with semiconductor quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99:237401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.237401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fischer B, Hoffmann M, Helm H, Modjesch G, Jepsen PU. Chemical recognition in terahertz time-domain spectroscopy and imaging. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2005;20:S246. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kampfrath T, et al. Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves. Nat. Photonics. 2011;5:31–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leemans W, et al. Observation of terahertz emission from a laser-plasma accelerated electron bunch crossing a plasma-vacuum boundary. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;91:074802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.074802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chiadroni E, et al. Characterization of the THz radiation source at the Frascati linear accelerator. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013;84:022703. doi: 10.1063/1.4790429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee J, Gensch M, Hinrichs K, Seidel W, Schade U. Determination of the polarization characteristics of the ELBE free electron laser. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2008;51:537–540. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sei N, Takahashi T. First demonstration of coherent Cherenkov radiation matched to circular plane wave. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:17440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17822-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Green, B. et al. High-field high-repetition-rate sources for the coherent THz control of matter. Sci. reports6 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Murdin B. Far-infrared free-electron lasers and their applications. Contemp. Phys. 2009;50:391–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Leinß S, et al. Terahertz coherent control of optically dark paraexcitons in Cu_2O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;101:246401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.246401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pietka B, et al. Doubly dressed bosons: exciton polaritons in a strong terahertz field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:077403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.077403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ryder MR, et al. Detecting molecular rotational dynamics complementing the low-frequency terahertz vibrations in a zirconium-based metal-organic framework. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:255502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.255502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vicario C, Shalaby M, Hauri CP. Subcycle extreme nonlinearities in GaP induced by an ultrastrong terahertz field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:083901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.083901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smith SJ, Purcell E. Visible light from localized surface charges moving across a grating. Phys. Rev. 1953;92:1069. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cook A, et al. Observation of narrow-band terahertz coherent Cherenkov radiation from a cylindrical dielectric-lined waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:095003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.095003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brownell J, Walsh J, Kirk H, Fernow R, Robertson S. Smith-Purcell radiation from a 50 MeV beam. Nucl. Instrum. Method. Phys. Res. A. 1997;393:323–325. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Korbly S, Kesar A, Sirigiri J, Temkin R. Observation of frequency-locked coherent terahertz Smith-Purcell radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:054803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.054803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khodnevych V, Delerue N, Bezshyyko O. Comparison of coherent Smith-Purcell radiation and coherent transition radiation. arXiv Prepr. arXiv. 2016;1604:08474. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Potylitsyn AP, Karataev PV, Naumenko GA. Resonant diffraction radiation from an ultrarelativistic particle moving close to a tilted grating. Phys. Rev. E. 2000;61:7039. doi: 10.1103/physreve.61.7039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Potylitsyn AP, Karlovets DV, Kube G. Resonant diffraction radiation from inclined gratings and bunch length measurements. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2008;266:3781–3788. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Potylitsyn AP, et al. Observation of subterahertz monochromatic transition radiation from a grating. JETP Lett. 2016;104:806–810. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Naumenko G, et al. Monochromatic coherent grating transition radiation in sub-THz frequency range. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2017;402:153–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Henri P, Haeberlé O, Rullhusen P, Maene N, Mondelaers W. Grating transition radiation: A source of quasimonochromatic radiation. Phys. Rev. E. 1999;60:6214. doi: 10.1103/physreve.60.6214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aryshev A, et al. Monochromaticity of coherent Smith-Purcell radiation from finite size grating. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams. 2017;20:024701. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Harris FJ. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform. Proc. IEEE. 1978;66:51–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Virginia diodes. www.vadiodes.com.
  • 28.Homes CC, Carr GL, Lobo RP, LaVeigne JD, Tanner DB. Silicon beam splitter for far-infrared and terahertz spectroscopy. Appl. Opt. 2007;46:7884–7888. doi: 10.1364/ao.46.007884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jeon T-I, Grischkowsky D. Nature of conduction in doped silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997;78:1106. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thorne, A. P. Spectrophysics (Chapman and Hall, 1988).
  • 31.Bell, R. Introductory Fourier transform spectroscopy (Elsevier, 2012).
  • 32.Paul O, Beigang R, Rahm M. Highly selective terahertz bandpass filters based on trapped mode excitation. Opt. Express. 2009;17:18590–18595. doi: 10.1364/OE.17.018590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brownell J, Doucas G. Role of the grating profile in smith-purcell radiation at high energies. Phys. Rev. Spec. topics-accelerators beams. 2005;8:091301. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kalinin B, et al. Comparison of smith–purcell radiation characteristics from gratings with different profiles. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B: Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2006;252:62–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Potylitsyn, A. P., Ryazanov, M. I., Strikhanov, M. N. & Tishchenko, A. A. Radiation from Relativistic Particles (Springer, 2010).
  • 36.Matsunaga R, et al. Higgs amplitude mode in the BCS superconductorsNb_1-xTi_xN induced by terahertz pulse excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111:057002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.057002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lampel, M. Coherent Smith-Purcell radiation for use in electron beam diagnostics. In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol.472, 785–794 (AIP, 1999).
  • 38.Andrews HL, et al. Reconstruction of the time profile of 20.35 GeV, subpicosecond long electron bunches by means of coherent Smith-Purcell radiation. Phys. Rev. ST. Accel. Beams. 2014;17:052802. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang H, et al. Non-destructive measurement and monitoring of separation of charged particle micro-bunches. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;111:043505. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Statnikov K, Grzyb J, Heinemann B, Pfeiffer UR. 160-GHz to 1-THz multi-color active imaging with a lens-coupled SiGe HBT chip-set. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2015;63:520–532. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aryshev A, Shevelev M, Honda Y, Terunuma N, Urakawa J. Femtosecond response time measurements of aCs_2Te photocathode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;111:033508. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shevelev M, et al. Coherent radiation spectrum measurements at KEK LUCX facility. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2015;771:126–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Saptari, V. Fourier transform spectroscopy instrumentation engineering, vol. 61 (SPIE press, 2004).
  • 44.Fröhlich, L. & Grimm, O. Bunch length measurements using a Martin-Puplett interferometer at the VUV-FEL. Tech. Rep., DESY (2005).
  • 45.Muto T, et al. Observation of incoherent diffraction radiation from a single-edge target in the visible-light region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;90:104801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.104801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shevelev M, Aryshev A, Honda Y, Terunuma N, Urakawa J. Influence of space charge effect in femtosecond electron bunch on coherent transition radiation spectrum. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2017;402:134–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Flöttmann, K. ASTRA: A space charge algorithm, user’s manual. Available from, http://www.desy.de.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available on request from the authors.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES