Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;10:7522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64462-x

Table 2.

Studies reporting technical accuracy rates for spine surgery with lumbosacral and thoracic pedicle screw placement using the augmented reality surgical navigation system (ARSN).

Study Surgical technique Navigation type Performed on Devices placed No. of pedicles Clinical accuracy, Gertzbein 0-1 (%) Technical accuracy, mean error in 2D (mm) Statistical significance versus technical accuracy of current study
Elmi-Terander et al., 201616 Open Navigated path Cadaver Screws 47 40/47 (85%) nd nd
Elmi-Terander et al., 201817 MIS Navigated path Cadaver Jamshidi 66 nd 2.2 ± 1.3 p < 0.001
MIS Navigated path Cadaver Screws 18 16/18 (89%) nd nd
Elmi-Terander et al., 201815 Open Navigated path Patients Screws 253 238/253 (94.1%) 1.97 ± 1.33 p < 0.001
Burström et al., 201918 MIS Instrument tracking Porcine Jamshidi 78 76-78/78 (100, 97.4, 97.4)* 1.7 ± 1.0 p < 0.001
Current study MIS Instrument tracking + surgical robot Cadaver Jamshidi 113 113/113 (100%)* 0.94 ± 0.59

Data are presented as absolute numbers, percentages or mean ± standard deviation. Abbreviations: MIS = Minimally invasive surgery, nd = no data. *Simulated Gertzbein grading: screw diameters extrapolated from Jamshidi needle center to represent up to 4, 6, or 7 mm screws.