Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;10:7523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64574-4

Table 1.

Subjects’ characteristics.

MAA (n = 56) Maastricht AMS (n = 42) Amsterdam
Age 59.1 ± 1.0 54.9 ± 1.1
Weight (kg) 96.5 ± 1.3 116.3 ± 2.0
BMI (kg/m2) 31.2 ± 0.4 34.8 ± 0.5
Waist/hip ratio 0.95 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.01
Fasting insulin (mU/ml) 16.80 ± 0.79 20.02 ± 1.24
Fasting glucose (mmol/l) 6.06 ± 0.07 5.76 ± 0.09
HOMA-IR 4.5 ± 0.2 5.1 ± 0.3
HOMA-B% 136.3 ± 7.5 192.0 ± 15.3
HbA1c (%) 5.58 ± 0.05 5.74 ± 0.05
Fasting TAG 1.30 ± 0.10 1.50 ± 0.11
Rd (umol*kg-1*min-1)* 23.34 (10.7–51.4) 26.1 (10.1–40.0)
Suppression EGP (%)* 44.1(17.4–79.1) 55.6 (30.8–85.0)
Suppression FFA (%)* 45.3(−6,1–84.1) 74.4(53.9–92.1)

HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, HOMA-B%: homeostasis model assessment for beta-cell function, HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin, TAG: triacylglycerol, Rd: rate of disappearance, EGP: endogenous glucose production by the liver, FFA: free fatty acids. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Clamp-results are expressed as mean (range). *due to differences in clamp procedures (see Methods) between centers, no statistical comparison was made between cohorts.