Skip to main content
. 2019 May 25;3(2):796–810. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz039

Table 6.

Estimates of retained energy1 (RE) in confined beef cows fed high- and low-energy density diets at 80% or 120% of NASEM (2016) predicted energy requirement

High-energy diet2 Low-energy diet Probability
Model 80 120 80 120 SEM Diet Intake Diet × intake
NASEM −1.77 8.13 −8.02 0.55 5.28 0.17 0.07 0.89
Ferrell and Jenkins (1984, 1) 4.57 17.10 −0.52 8.04 5.09 0.15 0.03 0.68
Ferrell and Jenkins (1984, 2) 7.92 24.08 6.69 12.37 6.06 0.27 0.06 0.37
Gresham et al. (1986) 1.70 10.15 −4.18 3.17 5.01 0.18 0.10 0.90
Wagner et al. (1988, 1) 1.41 7.38 −2.39 2.57 3.25 0.17 0.08 0.87
Wagner et al. (1988, 2) 5.48 16.67 4.63 8.56 4.20 0.27 0.06 0.37
Wagner et al. (1988, 3) 5.62 16.59 4.53 8.56 4.17 0.26 0.06 0.38
Wagner et al. (1988, 4) −1.97 −0.92 −7.52 −2.47 4.68 0.43 0.49 0.65

1kcal/d/EBW0.75, calculated as RE/d/EBW0.75, where d = 56 days.

2Formulated NEm concentrations for high- and low-energy diets were 1.54 and 1.08 Mcal/kg, respectively.