Skip to main content
. 2019 May 25;3(2):796–810. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz039

Table 8.

Effect of diet energy density and level of intake on digestibility1 and ruminal fill in ruminally cannulated steers

High-energy diet Low-energy diet Probability
Item2 80 120 80 120 SEM Diet Intake Diet × intake
DMI, kg/d 2.82a 4.22b 3.96c 5.88d 0.135 <0.01 <0.01 0.08
DMI, g/kg EBW0.75 44.18a 66.64c 59.74b 75.10d 1.622 <0.01 <0.01 0.04
Digestibility, %
 DM 68.1a 60.5b 57.5b 59.1b 1.6 <0.01 <0.01 0.01
 OM 71.7a 64.0b 61.3b 63.4b 1.6 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
 ADF 49.7a 44.0b 50.9a 52.3a 1.8 <0.01 <0.01 0.08
 GE 68.6a 61.1b 59.0b 60.7b 1.7 <0.01 <0.01 0.02
Energy availability, Mcal/kg
 GE 4.31 4.27
 DE 2.96a 2.63b 2.52b 2.60b 0.071 <0.01 0.11 0.01
 ME 2.42a 2.06b 2.06b 2.13b 0.058 <0.01 0.11 0.01
 NEm 1.54a 1.30b 1.21b 1.27b 0.053 <0.01 0.11 0.01
Energy intake, Mcad/d
 GE 12.13 18.09 16.31 20.75 0.593 <0.01 <0.01 0.22
 DE 8.34 11.09 9.63 12.60 0.512 0.02 <0.01 0.85
 ME 6.84 9.10 7.89 10.34 0.420 0.02 <0.01 0.85
 NEm 4.34 5.48 4.64 6.18 0.305 0.20 <0.01 0.51
Ruminal DM fill, kg 3.39 4.57 4.41 4.92 0.276 0.02 0.01 0.24

a,b,c,dWithin a row, means without a common superscript letter differ (P < 0.05).

1Observed via feed and fecal analysis.

2DMI = dry matter intake; DM = dry matter; OM = organic matter; ADF = acid detergent fiber; GE = gross energy; DE = digestible energy; ME = metabolizable energy; NEm = net energy for maintenance; EBW = empty body weight.