Table 5.
Milk analysis results
| High* | Low† | WP‡ | SP§ | WP * SP¶ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Light | Heavy | Light | Heavy | SE | P value | P value | P value |
| Milk yield | ||||||||
| Yield, kg | 2.1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 2 | 0.28 | <0.08 | 0.11 | 0.45 |
| g/kg cow BW | 3.92 | 4.09 | 2.14 | 3.18 | 0.5 | <0.02 | 0.23 | 0.39 |
| Milk constituents | ||||||||
| Fat, % | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.25 |
| SNF, % | 9.3 | 9.4 | 9.3 | 9.1 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.84 | 0.35 |
| TS, % | 11 | 10.6 | 10.5 | 10.4 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.39 | 0.49 |
| Protein, % | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 0.11 | 0.34 | 0.72 | 0.19 |
| Lactose, % | 4.8 | 5.1a | 5 | 4.7b | 0.1 | 0.57 | 0.83 | <0.01 |
*High = high WWR group.
†Low = low WWR group.
‡Whole plot = cow WWR.
§Split-plot = cow BW.
¶Whole-split-plot interaction was the interaction between WWR and cow BW.
P values were considered significant at ≤0.05 and were considered as a trend toward significance at ≤0.1.
a,bMeans within a row with different superscripts differ (P ≤ 0.05).