Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;11:307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00307

Table 2.

Parameter estimates for the mediation model (dependent variable: CAPE total).

Estimate SE Bootstrap (n=5,000)
95%CIlow 95%CIhigh p
Predictor: DACOBS ATB
Total effect
DACOBS ATB→CAPE 0.90 0.14 0.63 1.18 <0.001
Direct effects
DACOBS ATB → PSS-10 0.40 0.08 0.24 0.57 <0.001
PSS-10 → CAPE 0.90 0.09 0.73 1.07 <0.001
DACOBS ATB → CAPE 0.54 0.14 0.30 0.79 <0.001
Sex → PSS-10 −2.07 0.68 −3.41 −0.73 0.01
Age → PSS-10 0.00 0.15 −0.30 0.30 0.99
Sex → CAPE 4.17 0.98 2.24 6.11 <0.001
Age → CAPE −0.02 0.22 −0.45 0.41 0.93
Predictor: DACOBS ETB
Total effect
DACOBS ETB-> CAPE 1.18 0.15 0.89 1.46 <0.001
Direct effects
DACOBS ETB → PSS-10 0.65 0.09 0.48 0.82 <0.001
PSS-10 → CAPE 0.82 0.09 0.64 1.00 <0.001
DACOBS ETB → CAPE 0.64 0.14 0.37 0.92 <0.001
Sex → PSS-10 2.26 0.65 −3.53 −0.99 <0.001
Age → PSS-10 0.03 0.14 −0.26 0.31 0.86
Sex → CAPE 3.88 0.99 1.94 5.83 <0.001
Age → CAPE −0.03 0.22 −0.46 0.39 0.88

n = 275; R2 when DACOBS ATB is the predictor = 0.27, p < 0.001; R2 when DACOBS ETB is the predictor = 0.30, p < 0.001; PSS-10, total score of Perceived Stress Scale; DACOBS ATB, Attention to Threat Bias subscale score of the DACOBS; DACOBS ETB, External Attribution Bias subscale score for DACOBS; CAPE total, total score of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences; women were coded as −1, men were coded as 1.

The statistically significant results were written in bold.