Table 5.
Conditional indirect effects of attention to threat bias on CAPE at values of the CISS distraction.
| Values of the CISS distraction | Effect | SE | Bootstrap (n=5,000) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% CIlow | 95% CIhigh | |||
| Dependent variable: CAPE total | ||||
| Mean − 1SD | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.44 |
| Mean | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.52 |
| Mean+1SD | 0.42 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.63 |
| Dependent variable: CAPE positive | ||||
| Mean − 1SD | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
| Mean | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.13 |
| Mean+1SD | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.18 |
| Dependent variable: CAPE depression | ||||
| Mean − 1SD | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.19 |
| Mean | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.21 |
| Mean+1SD | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.25 |
n = 275; CAPE total, total score of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences; CAPE negative, negative symptoms subscale of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences; CAPE positive, positive symptoms subscale of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences; CAPE depression, depression subscale of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences; CISS distraction, score of subscale of Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations measuring distraction seeking coping style.