Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;4(2):831–838. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa011

Table 3.

Effect of EB on DMI and growth performance of backgrounding and finishing feedlot steers

Treatment P valuea
Item Control 0.5% EB 1.0% EB 2.0% EB SEMb Treat Control vs. EB
Total weight gain, kg 397.5 393.4 393.7 378.6 5.44 0.06 0.15
Overall ADG, kg/d 1.71 1.69 1.69 1.62 0.025 0.08 0.17
NEm, Mcal/kg DMc 1.98 1.96 1.99 1.96 0.026 0.76 0.68
NEg, Mcal/kg DMc 1.35 1.33 1.36 1.33 0.023 0.76 0.68
Backgrounding
 Shrunk initial BW, kg 276.3 273.3 274.4 274.8 3.92 0.96 0.65
 Shrunk final BW, kg 388.0 382.5 384.6 380.2 5.05 0.73 0.34
 DMI, kg/d 8.26 8.28 8.02 8.01 0.127 0.32* 0.32
 ADG, kg/d 1.36 1.39 1.34 1.31 0.029 0.29* 0.46
 G:F 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.004 0.67* 0.99
 NEm, Mcal/kg DMc 1.55 1.55 1.57 1.53 0.021 0.65 0.88
 NEg, Mcal/kg DMc 0.97 0.96 0.98 0.95 0.018 0.65 0.88
Finishing
 Shrunk initial BW, kg 439.6 432.2 436.3 429.4 5.47 0.56 0.27
 Shrunk final BW, kg 670.3 664.1 665.7 661.0 4.31 0.47 0.24
 DMI, kg/d 10.4 10.6 10.4 10.1 0.19 0.40* 0.85
 ADG, kg/d 1.91 1.95 2.00 1.91 0.036 0.28* 0.65
 G:F 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.004 0.82* 0.68
 NEm, Mcal/kg DMc 2.14 2.09 2.13 2.11 0.035 0.81 0.52
 NEg, Mcal/kg DMc 1.49 1.44 1.48 1.46 0.031 0.81 0.52

aControl vs. EB = control vs. all EB treatments.

b n = 4 per treatment.

cCalculated based on performance (Zinn and Shen, 1998)

*Indicate significantly different treatment × period means (P < 0.05).