Table 3.
Effect of EB on DMI and growth performance of backgrounding and finishing feedlot steers
| Treatment | P valuea | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Control | 0.5% EB | 1.0% EB | 2.0% EB | SEMb | Treat | Control vs. EB |
| Total weight gain, kg | 397.5 | 393.4 | 393.7 | 378.6 | 5.44 | 0.06 | 0.15 |
| Overall ADG, kg/d | 1.71 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.62 | 0.025 | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| NEm, Mcal/kg DMc | 1.98 | 1.96 | 1.99 | 1.96 | 0.026 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
| NEg, Mcal/kg DMc | 1.35 | 1.33 | 1.36 | 1.33 | 0.023 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
| Backgrounding | |||||||
| Shrunk initial BW, kg | 276.3 | 273.3 | 274.4 | 274.8 | 3.92 | 0.96 | 0.65 |
| Shrunk final BW, kg | 388.0 | 382.5 | 384.6 | 380.2 | 5.05 | 0.73 | 0.34 |
| DMI, kg/d | 8.26 | 8.28 | 8.02 | 8.01 | 0.127 | 0.32* | 0.32 |
| ADG, kg/d | 1.36 | 1.39 | 1.34 | 1.31 | 0.029 | 0.29* | 0.46 |
| G:F | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.004 | 0.67* | 0.99 |
| NEm, Mcal/kg DMc | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.57 | 1.53 | 0.021 | 0.65 | 0.88 |
| NEg, Mcal/kg DMc | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.018 | 0.65 | 0.88 |
| Finishing | |||||||
| Shrunk initial BW, kg | 439.6 | 432.2 | 436.3 | 429.4 | 5.47 | 0.56 | 0.27 |
| Shrunk final BW, kg | 670.3 | 664.1 | 665.7 | 661.0 | 4.31 | 0.47 | 0.24 |
| DMI, kg/d | 10.4 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 10.1 | 0.19 | 0.40* | 0.85 |
| ADG, kg/d | 1.91 | 1.95 | 2.00 | 1.91 | 0.036 | 0.28* | 0.65 |
| G:F | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.004 | 0.82* | 0.68 |
| NEm, Mcal/kg DMc | 2.14 | 2.09 | 2.13 | 2.11 | 0.035 | 0.81 | 0.52 |
| NEg, Mcal/kg DMc | 1.49 | 1.44 | 1.48 | 1.46 | 0.031 | 0.81 | 0.52 |
aControl vs. EB = control vs. all EB treatments.
b n = 4 per treatment.
cCalculated based on performance (Zinn and Shen, 1998)
*Indicate significantly different treatment × period means (P < 0.05).