Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;4(2):831–838. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa011

Table 5.

Effect of EB on eating behavior of backgrounding and finishing steers

Treatment P value
Item Control 0.5% EB 1.0% EB 2.0% EB SEMa Treat Control vs. EBb
Backgrounding
 DMI, kg/d 8.08 8.17 8.05 8.24 0.225 0.93 0.77
 SD of DMI, kg/dc 0.92 1.00 0.96 1.01 0.029 0.11 0.07
 Meal frequency, meals/d 11.4 12.1 12.0 11.1 0.43 0.32 0.41
 Duration, min/meal 13.7 14.2 13.4 15.0 0.61 0.28 0.52
 Intermeal interval, min 124.2 115.6 116.3 125.0 4.55 0.32 0.32
 Meal size, kg/meal 0.77 0.73 0.72 0.79 0.036 0.46 0.60
 Eating rate, g/min 56.8 51.9 55.1 53.7 1.86 0.31 0.14
Finishing
 DMI, kg/d 10.6 11.0 10.6 10.5 0.23 0.34 0.64
 SD of DMI, kg/dc 1.50 1.60 1.57 1.52 0.055 0.49 0.33
 Meal frequency, meals/d 8.3 8.6 8.1 8.0 0.32 0.52 0.84
 Duration, min/meal 9.5 10.2 10.4 10.6 0.52 0.51 0.31
 Intermeal interval, min 180.2 172.0 182.5 186.8 7.77 0.53 0.97
 Meal size, kg/meal 1.37 1.34 1.38 1.40 0.058 0.91 0.99
 Eating rate, g/min 139.2 136.2 133.5 132.1 5.64 0.81 0.41

a n = 20 steers per treatment; individual steer was the experiment unit.

bControl vs. EB = control vs. all EB treatments.

cDay-to-day variation of DMI.