TABLE 5.

Analysis. Part 2.

Contingency table
Service	Service 2				Total
	0	1	2	3
0	0	0	1	0	1
1	0	2	1	1	4
2	0	0	1	3	4
3	1	0	0	20	21
Total	1	2	3	24	30

χ2 Tests
	Value	df	P
χ2	28.4	9	<0.001
N	30

Contingency table
Teamwork	Teamwork 2				Total
	0	1	2	3
1	1	7	0	2	10
2	1	1	0	1	3
3	0	2	4	11	17
Total	2	10	4	14	30

χ2 Tests
	Value	df	P
χ2	16.8	6	0.010
N	30

Contingency table
Setting Object-ives	Vision				Total
	0	1	2	3
0	1	0	0	0	1
1	1	1	1	1	4
2	0	3	3	1	7
3	1	4	2	11	IS
Total	3	S	6	13	30

χ2 Tests
	Value	df	P
χ2	17.4	9	0.043
N	30

Contingency table
Empowerment	Courage				Total
	0	1	2	3
1	1	1	0	0	2
2	0	1	1	1	3
3	1	9	4	11	25
Total	2	11	5	12	30

χ2 Tests
	Value	df	P
χ2	7.92	6	0.239
N	30

Contingency table
Management	Role models				Total
	−1	1	2	3
1	1	6	1	4	12
2	0	1	2	6	9
3	0	1	2	6	9
Total	1	8	5	16	30

χ2 Tests
	Value	df	P
χ2	7.92	6	0.244
N	30

Contingency table
Integrity	Humility				Total
	1	2	3
−1	0	0	1		1
1	2	1	5		8
2	0	1	5		6
3	1	0	14		15
Total	3	2	25		30

χ2 Tests
	Value	df	P
χ2	5.67	6	0.461
N	30

Contingency table
Team care	Team discussion						Total
	−3	−1	0	1	2	3
1	0	1	1	4	0	1	7
2	1	0	1	0	0	2	4
3	0	0	2	5	3	9	19
Total	1	1	4	9	3	12	30

χ2 Tests
	Value	df	P
χ2	16.6	10	0.084
N	30

Kruskal-Wallis test
Range
	1=Commitment; 2=Environment; 3=Satisfaction			N		Average range
Score	1			30		43.77
	2			30		50.40
	3			30		42.33
	Total			90

Test Statistics
	Score
χ2	1.839
gl	2
Asymptotic Sig.	0.399