Skip to main content
. 2020 May;145(5):1438–1451. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.12.910

Table II.

CIT identifies genes for which DNAm likely mediates RA genetic risk

Gene CpG Lead meQTL SNP Bayes colocalization PP4 Locus CIT P value CIT Permutation FDR
CD4+T cell
ANKRD55 cg21124310 rs6859219 1.00 5q11.2 1.11 × 10−4 7.06 × 10−4
cg10404427 rs6859219 1.00 .0057 0.0044
cg23343972 rs6859219 1.00 .0062 0.0069
cg15431103 rs6859219 0.95 .0496 0.0319
JAZF1 cg07522171 rs2189966 0.97 7p15.1 3.97 × 10−4 0.0035
cg11187739 rs4722758 0.99 .0035 0.0044
cg16130019 rs917117 0.99 .0529 0.0319
ORMDL3 cg18711369 rs12946510 0.86 17q12 4.46 × 10−4 0.0035
cg10909506 rs12946510 0.93 .0016 0.0044
FCRL3 cg17134153 rs2210913 0.99 1q23.1 .0027 0.0044
cg01045635 rs2210913 0.99 .0120 0.0296
IL6ST cg15431103 rs6859219 0.95 5q11.2 .0100 0.0296
cg15667493 rs6859219 0.99 .0139 0.0296
cg10404427 rs6859219 1.00 .0216 0.0305
cg21124310 rs6859219 1.00 .0349 0.0305
cg23343972 rs6859219 1.00 .0352 0.0305
C11orf10 cg16213375 rs61897793 1.00 11q12.2 .0163 0.0296
TAX1BP1 cg11187739 rs4722758 0.99 7p15.1 .0470 0.0305
GSDMB cg18711369 rs12946510 0.86 17q12 .0277 0.0305
cg10909506 rs12946510 0.93 .0448 0.0305
B cell
FCRL3 cg19602479 rs2210913 0.99 1q23.1 4.69 × 10−4 0.0420
cg01045635 rs7522061 0.97 5.49 × 10−4 0.0420
CCR6 cg15222091 rs3093025 0.98 6q27 .0101 0.0966
cg19954286 rs3093025 0.98 .0258 0.1330
cg05094429 rs3093025 0.96 .0347 0.1330
IKZF3 cg18691862 rs9903250 0.44 17q12 .0249 0.1330
ORMDL3 cg12749226 rs11557466 0.97 17q12 .0249 0.1330

For the top results in CD4+ T cells and B cells, we report the raw omnibus CIT P value, and FDR value calculated using 1000 permutations.44 Here, we report all instances of P < .05, highlighting those that satisfy the FDR 0.05 threshold. In instances whereby CIT implicates multiple Illumina probes for the same gene, we report the most statistically significant probe. Results from all CITs across both cell types are available in Tables E17 and E18.

PP4 from the Bayesian colocalization analysis38 reports the previous probability that the associations with RA susceptibility and DNAm levels shared the same common genetic variant; only reported where PP4/PP3 > 5 (see this article’s Methods section in the Online Repository at www.jacionline.org).