Skip to main content
. 2020 May 3;81(2):203–211. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.203

Table 2.

The association of the original SAM motives measure at baseline with SAM use at baseline (n = 1,014)

graphic file with name jsad.2020.81.203tbl2.jpg

Model 1
Model 2
Variable Standardized estimate Standard error Wald χ2 Standardized estimate Standard error Wald χ2
Intercept 1.66 0.11 225.17*** 1.60 0.11 223.95***
Age 0.15 0.04 13.07*** 0.12 0.04 7.94**
Malea -0.17 0.04 14.61*** -0.16 0.04 14.75***
Whiteb -0.20 0.05 13.65*** -0.19 0.05 13.63***
Asianb -0.13 0.08 2.59 -0.14 0.08 3.28
School Bc -0.09 0.10 0.71 -0.11 0.10 1.23
School Cc 0.03 0.05 0.37 0.04 0.05 0.71
Alcohol motivesd
 Enhancement 0.07 0.06 1.22 0.00 0.06 0.00
 Coping 0.12 0.06 4.87* 0.11 0.06 2.95
 Social -0.09 0.06 2.24 -0.05 0.06 0.63
Marijuana motivesd
 Enhancement 0.44 0.06 46.97*** 0.35 0.06 30.55***
 Coping 0.19 0.06 9.88** 0.03 0.06 0.23
 Social 0.01 0.06 0.01 -0.07 0.07 0.98
SAM motives
 Conformity -0.37 0.05 57.26***
 Positive effects 0.09 0.06 2.67
 Calm/coping 0.27 0.06 24.71***
 Social 0.27 0.07 15.72***

Notes: Reference group = aFemale, bother, cSchool A, dmotives that capture the same construct are named differently on the validated measures (enhancement = positive effects, coping = calm/coping). Alcohol conformity motives and marijuana conformity motives were excluded from the analyses (see text for explanation). SAM = simultaneous alcohol and marijuana.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.