Skip to main content
. 2020 May 3;81(2):135–143. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.135

Table 2.

Means and standard deviations for cognitive risk factors at baseline and follow-up assessments by study condition and sex

graphic file with name jsad.2020.81.135tbl2.jpg

Sex
Outcomes Malea M (SD) Femaleb M (SD) Total samplec M (SD)
Perception of frequency of peer drinking
 Control
  Baseline 5.47 (1.31) 5.49 (1.02) 5.48 (1.16)
  Follow-up 5.37 (1.47) 5.57 (0.89) 5.48 (1.19)
 Intervention
  Baseline 5.37 (1.09) 5.74 (0.88) 5.57 (0.99)
  Follow-up 5.11 (1.15) 5.35 (1.05) 5.24 (1.10)
Perception of frequency of peer drunkenness
 Control
  Baseline 2.93 (1.15) 3.40 (1.40) 3.19 (1.31)
  Follow-up 2.97 (1.16) 3.57 (118) 3.29 (1.21)
 Intervention
  Baseline 3.11 (1.06) 3.90 (1.18) 3.55 (1.19)
  Follow-up 2.83 (1.08) 3.09 (1.18) 2.98 (1.14)
Sex-specific perception of heavy episodic drinking
 Control
  Baseline 2.61 (2.93) 2.69 (2.19) 2.65 (2.55)
  Follow-up 2.95 (2.81) 3.45 (3.23) 3.22 (3.04)
 Intervention
  Baseline 2.87 (2.46) 3.03 (2.45) 2.96 (2.44)
  Follow-up 2.20 (1.82) 2.59 (2.47) 2.42 (2.21)
Positive alcohol expectancies
 Control
  Baseline 27.73 (7.42) 27.73 (7.11) 27.73 (7.23)
  Follow-up 27.46 (8.53) 27.49 (6.70) 27.48 (7.57)
 Intervention
  Baseline 30.52 (6.34) 30.40 (5.38) 30.45 (5.81)
  Follow-up 28.76 (6.20) 28.77 (7.57) 28.77 (6.97)
a

Control group, n = 57; intervention group, n = 71.

b

Control group, n = 67; intervention group, n = 88.

c

Control group, n = 124; intervention group, n = 159.