Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;3(5):e204088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4088

Table 2. Summary of Major Outcomes.

Source Mean length of stay among intervention vs comparator, d In-hospital mortality among intervention vs comparator, No./total No. (%) 30 d readmissions among intervention vs comparator, No./total No. (%) Any medical complication among intervention vs comparator, No./total No. (%) Costs among intervention vs comparator, US $
Unadjusted Adjusted
Zuckerman et al,36 1992 23.2 vs 27.7 NA 25/431 (5.8) vs 3/60 (5.0) NA 162/431 (37.6) vs 39/60 (65.0) NA
Macpherson et al,28 1994 19.7 vs 27.2; mean difference, −7.5; 95% CI, −1.9 to −13.1 NA 2/79 (2.5) vs 7/86 (8.1) 3/79 (3.8) vs 3/86 (3.5) NA NA
Huddleston et al,24 2004 5.6 vs 5.7; mean difference, −0.1; 95% CI, −0.5 to 0.2 NA 0/232 vs 1/237 (0.4) NA 89/232 (38.4) vs 119/237 (50.2) Mean direct medical costs per patient, 15 373 vs 15 283
Pinzur et al,31 2009 NA O/E ratio, 0.693 vs 0.862 NA NA NA O/E cost of hospital care, 0.684 vs 0.699
Salottolo et al,23 2009 4.2 vs 3.6 4.1 vs 3.7 2/261 (0.8) vs 4/239 (1.7); adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.07 to 2.26 NA 9.8% vs 10.5%; adjusted OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.02 NA
Auerbach et al,26 2010 5.0 (IQR, 3.8) vs 5.0 (IQR, 3.8)a Adjusted rate ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.03 88/3393 (2.6) vs 104/4203 (2.5); adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.05 192/3393 (5.7) vs 277/4203 (6.6); adjusted OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.05 NA 24 533 (IQR, 15 881 to 41 943) vs 23 867 (IQR, 15 133 to 40 966); adjusted rate ratio 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.00)a
Della Rocca et al,38 2013 7.1 (95% CI, 6.3 to 7.9) vs 9.9 (95% CI, 6.4 to 13.3) NA 5/115 (4.3) vs 3/31 (9.7) 16/115 (13.9) vs 6/31 (19.4) NA Mean costs per patient, 38 586 (95% CI, 35 210 to 41 963) vs 52 323 (95% CI, 31 641 to 77 006)
Montero Ruiz et al,30 2015a 3.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.2) vs 2.8 (95% CI, 2.2 to 3.4); mean difference, 0.7; 95% CI, −0.2 to 1.7 Mean adjusted difference, −0.8; 95% CI, −1.6 to −0.1 1.2% (95% CI, 0.4% to 2.1%) vs 0.3% (95% CI, 0% to 0.6%) 3.0% (95% CI, 1.6% to 4.3%) vs 2.8% (95% CI, 1.8% to 3.9%)c NA Estimated mean cost savings per hospitalization, €258.40
Montero Ruiz et al,29 2015b 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8) vs 1.8 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.1); median difference, –0.3; 95% CI, −0.8 to 0.2a Mean adjusted difference, −0.5; 95% CI, –1.0 to 0.01 0% vs 0% 4.5% (95% CI, 1.9% to 7.1%) vs 3.2% (95% CI, 1.3% to 5.0%)b NA Estimated mean cost savings per hospitalization, €161.50
Iberti et al,27 2016 6.1 vs 5.1 O/E ratio, 0.88 vs 0.83 1.00% vs 2.01% 20.6% vs 21.9% NA NA
Noticewala et al,25 2016 8.2 (SD, 4.1) vs 10.7 (SD, 13.6) NA 4/129 (3.1) vs 2/138 (1.4) NA NA NA
Rohatgi et al,32 2016 NA Propensity score adjusted, 4.6 (SD, 2.2) vs 5.4 (SD, 2.2) 40/4650 (0.9) vs 173/14156 (1.2)c 1.9% vs 3.4%; propensity score adjusted, 1.8% vs 3.0%; OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.90 8.2% vs 10.1%; propensity score adjusted; 8.0% vs 9.5%; OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.95d Estimated mean cost savings per patient, 2642 to 4303
Soong et al,33 2016 11.9 (SD, 13.7) vs 18.2 (SD, 18.4) NA 7/331 (2.1) vs 12/240 (5.0) 20/331 (6.0) vs 11/240 (4.6) NA Total mean (SD) hospital costs per hospitalization, CAD $13 755 (CAD $11 899) vs CAD $18 706 (CAD $25 198)
Rohatgi et al,37 2018 6.3 (SD, 8.3) vs 7.6 (SD, 8.5)c Adjusted RR for length of stay >5 d, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.83 5/1062 (0.5) vs 4/938 (0.4)c 172/1062 (16.1) vs 122/938 (13.0); adjusted RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.00 to 3.64 96/1062 (9.0) vs 95/938 (10.1); adjusted RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.24 Median direct cost of care, −10.3%

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; O/E, observed/expected; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk.

a

Median reported.

b

15-day readmission rate reported.

c

Additional data obtained from author.

d

Outcome defined as patients with more than 1 complication.