Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 18;62(12):4269–4281. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-19-0112

Table 5.

Results of the linear mixed-effects regressions on acoustic measurements.

Fixed effect Estimate SE t (df) p
Speech rate (Intercept) 2.814 0.176 16.020 (9.8) < .001
Talker_HD 0.396 0.237 1.670 (8.1) .133
Style_Conversational 2.149 0.032 66.800 (1509) < .001
Talker_HD: Conversational −0.525 0.045 −11.550 (1509) < .001
Average F0 (Intercept) 199.531 7.052 28.296 (8.1) < .001
Talker_HD −6.593 9.955 −0.662 (8.1) .526
Style_Conversational −6.013 1.056 −5.692 (1509) < .001
Talker_HD: Conversational 6.360 1.494 4.257 (1509) < .001
F0 range (Intercept) 210.863 11.400 18.497 (9) < .001
Talker_HD −21.817 15.952 −1.368 (8.6) .206
Style_Conversational −53.975 4.320 −12.495 (1509.5) < .001
Talker_HD: Conversational 31.564 6.109 5.167 (1509.5) < .001
Energy: 1–3 kHz (Intercept) 18.018 2.855 6.311 (8.1) < .001
Talker_HD −1.415 4.032 −0.351 (8) .735
Style_Conversational −2.488 0.161 −15.473 (1509) < .001
Talker_HD: Conversational 1.891 0.227 8.318 (1509) < .001

Note. Each intercept represents a reference condition: The talker group was the low-depressive group, and the sentence style was clear speech. HD = high depressive; F0 = fundamental frequency.