Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 5;62(12):4433–4449. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0221

Table 2.

Model with Group × Time × Condition interaction for the recall test outcome.

Fixed effects b 95% CI bstd p
 Group (DLD vs. TD) −0.53 −2.97 1.92 .672
 Condition (RRCR vs. RS) 1.54 0.17 2.91 .028
 Item (learn vs. gen) 0.29 0.12 0.45 .001
 Time (1 week vs. 5 min) 0.27 −0.06 0.60 .113
 Two-way interactions
  Group × Time 0.23 −0.23 0.69 .329
  Condition × Time −0.23 −0.70 0.24 .337
  Group × Condition 1.75 −0.16 3.65 .072
 Three-way interactions
  Group × Time × Condition −0.73 −1.39 −0.08 −0.31 .028
 Covariates
  PPVT-4 0.01 −0.10 0.08 .888
  Maternal education −0.32 −0.82 0.18 .204
  EVT-2 0.13 0.00 0.25 .050
  K-ABC2 −0.03 −0.11 0.06 .698
  Intercept
−2.66
−16.06
10.75

.698
Random effects
σ2




 Condition 5.99 3.39 10.63
 Intercept 5.14 2.78 9.51

Note. N = 27, observations = 216. CI = confidence interval; DLD = developmental language disorder; TD = typically developing; RRCR = repeated retrieval with contextual reinstatement; RS = repeated study; learn = learned; gen = generalization; PPVT-4 = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition; EVT-2 = Expressive Vocabulary Test–Second Edition; K-ABC2 = Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition.