Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 5;62(12):4433–4449. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0221

Table 5.

Model with Group × Condition interaction for the recognition outcome.

Fixed effects b 95% CI bstd p
 Group (DLD vs. TD) −1.39 2.89 0.12 .071
 Condition (RRCR vs. RS) 0.23 −0.35 0.81 .437
 Item (learn vs. gen) 0.29 −0.11 0.69 .160
 Two-way interactions
  Group × Condition 1.12 0.29 1.94 0.66 .008
 Covariates
  PPVT-4 −0.01 −0.07 0.05 .737
  Maternal education −0.18 −0.49 0.13 .252
  EVT-2 0.01 −0.07 0.09 .773
  K-ABC2 0.03 −0.02 0.09 .217
  Intercept
5.69
−2.67
14.05

.182
Random effects
σ2




 Condition 0.53 0.15 1.96
 Item 0.48 0.12 1.89
 Intercept 1.67 0.80 3.48

Note. N = 26, observations = 104. CI = confidence interval; DLD = developmental language disorder; TD = typically developing; RRCR = repeated retrieval with contextual reinstatement; RS = repeated study; learn = learned; gen = generalization; PPVT-4 = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition; EVT-2 = Expressive Vocabulary Test–Second Edition; K-ABC2 = Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition.