Table 5.
Performance comparison of different models on the ZW225 dataset.
| Methods | Prediction accuracy (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cy | Me | Mi | Nu | OA | |
| OF-SVM [3] | 85.7 | 91.0 | 68.0 | 82.9 | 85.3 |
| FTD-SVM [20] | 88.6 | 93.3 | 64.0 | 75.6 | 85.3 |
| GA_DCCA-SVM [36] | 87.1 | 91.0 | 68.0 | 75.6 | 84.4 |
| OA-SVM [16] | 93.3 | 92.1 | 96.0 | 93.5 | 92.2 |
| IACC-SVM [18] | 88.6 | 92.1 | 64.0 | 75.6 | 84.9 |
| EN-FKNN [37] | 94.3 | 94.4 | 60.0 | 80.5 | 88.0 |
| Dual-layer SVM [38] | 91.4 | 94.4 | 76.0 | 78.1 | 88.4 |
| This paper | 100 | 100 | 97.47 | 94.80 | 97.67 |