Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;7:25. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00191-6

Table 2.

Postoperative results at the 12-month follow-up after UT-DSAEK and DMEK

UT-DSAEK DMEK p
BCVA (logMAR) 0.10 ± 0.04 0.07 ± 0.07 0.24
Objective refraction (sphere, D) 0.92 ± 0.40 0.56 ± 0.17 0.001**
Objective refraction (cyl, D) −1.12 ± 0.55 −1.00 ± 0.34 0.45
Subjective refraction (sphere, D) 0.56 ± 0.47 0.29 ± 0.25 0.07
Subjective refraction (cyl, D) −0.62 ± 0.67 −0.62 ± 0.52 0.82
Spherical Equivalent (D) 0.25 ± 0.39 − 0.01 ± 0.33 0.07
Sim K1 (D) 43.42 ± 0.67 43.51 ± 0.96 0.14
Sim K2 (D) 44.39 ± 0.85 44.30 ± 0.97 0.77
Avg (D) 43.90 ± 0.75 43.91 ± 0.95 0.67
Cyl total (D) −0.98 ± 0.27 −0.79 ± 0.30 0.11
Corneal pachymetry (μm) 570.38 ± 21.96 516.29 ± 33.52 < 0.001**
Graft central thickness (μm) 77.85 ± 22.02
Graft peripheral thickness (μm) 107.46 ± 28.32
ECD (cell/mm2) 1772.62 ± 185.59 1590.94 ± 136.87 0.10

P value was assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test (non-parametric); UT-DSAEK= ultra-thin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; DMEK= Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; BCVA= best corrected visual acuity; logMAR= logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; SIMK= K-value of simulated keratometry; Avg= average; Cyl= cylinder; D= diopters; ECD= endothelial cell density. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). **p < 0.01