Table 5.
Correlations between BCVA and corneal aberrations at 4- and 6 mm optical zones 12 months after surgery
| UT-DSAEK 4.0 mm |
DMEK 4.0 mm |
UT-DSAEK 6.0 mm |
DMEK 6.0 mm |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | r | r | r | |
| HOAs total | − 0.091 | 0.618** | 0.213 | 0.448 |
| HOAs front | 0.647** | 0.912** | 0.334 | 0.500* |
| HOAs back | −0.091 | − 0.059 | 0.334 | 0.431 |
| Astigmatism total | −0.030 | 0.529* | 0.030 | 0.059 |
| Astigmatism front | 0.698** | 0.529* | 0.577* | 0.059 |
| Astigmatism back | −0.213 | −0.309 | −0.091 | − 0.412 |
| Coma total | 0.493* | 0.418 | 0.954** | 0.409 |
| Coma front | 0.556* | 0.322 | 0.880** | 0.413 |
| Coma back | −0.273 | 0.448 | −0.516* | 0.344 |
| Spherical aberration total | 0.375 | 0.446 | −0.395 | 0.425 |
| Spherical aberration front | 0.638** | 0.435 | −0.455 | 0.224 |
| Spherical aberration back | 0.063 | −0.405 | −0.395 | 0.224 |
Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r) are reported. UT-DSAEK= ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; DMEK= Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; HOAs= high order aberrations; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01