Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;2020:5407936. doi: 10.1155/2020/5407936

Table 4.

Primary and secondary outcomes for all groups on a per-patient and per-segment level.

Parameter Group BW Group LBW Group CO p value BW vs. LBW p value BW vs. CO p value LBW vs. CO
No. of patients n = 112 n = 108 n = 107      
Image quality parameters per patient
Attenuation (HU) 423 ± 60 404 ± 61 413 ± 63 0.024∗ 0.211 0.333
Scans 325–500HU (%) 83.9 84.3 86.9 0.947 0.532 0.579
Scans ≥325HU (%) 95.5 89.8 95.3 0.102 0.941 0.124
Noise 39 ± 8 39 ± 8 40 ± 9 0.844 0.332 0.451
CNR 14 ± 3 14 ± 3 14 ± 3 0.313 0.094 0.530
SNR 12 ± 3 11 ± 3 12 ± 5 0.117 0.970 0.265
Good-excellent image quality (%) 94.6 86.1 90.7 0.031∗ 0.257 0.299

No. of segments n = 1.599 n = 1.556 n = 1.523      
Image quality parameters per segment
Scans 325–500HU (%) 67.4 67.4 66.5 1.000 0.618 0.621
Scans ≥325HU (%) 90.7 87.2 88.6 0.002∗ 0.061† 0.224
Good-excellent image quality (%) 82.9 75.1 78.6 <0.001∗ 0.003† 0.023•

Note. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. BW = body weight; LBW = lean body weight; CO = cardiac output; HU= Hounsfield units; CNR = contrast-to-noise ratio; SNR = signal-to-noise ratio. ∗A significant difference was found between group BW and group LBW. †A significant difference was found between group BW and group CO. •A significant difference was found between group LBW and group CO.