Table 2.
Comparison of the efficiency of conjugate hydrolysis between method 1 and method 2.
| Method name | Daidzein glucuronide (m/z: 429/253 | Genistein glucuronide (m/z: 445/269) | Equol glucuronide (m/z: 417/241) | Daidzein monosulfate (m/z: 333/253) | Genistein monosulfate (m/z: 349/269) | Equol monosulfate (m/z: 321/241) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method 1 | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| Method 2 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Method 1 is the original method and does not result in complete hydrolysis of isoflavone and equol sulfates. Method 2 is the new method reported here which efficiently hydrolyses all the isoflavone and equol phase-2 conjugates including the sulfates. + denotes presence of compound after hydrolysis (i.e., not fully hydrolysed) and − denotes fully hydrolysed (i.e., no detectable conjugates observed after hydrolysis).