Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;2020:2359397. doi: 10.1155/2020/2359397

Table 2.

Comparison of the efficiency of conjugate hydrolysis between method 1 and method 2.

Method name Daidzein glucuronide (m/z: 429/253 Genistein glucuronide (m/z: 445/269) Equol glucuronide (m/z: 417/241) Daidzein monosulfate (m/z: 333/253) Genistein monosulfate (m/z: 349/269) Equol monosulfate (m/z: 321/241)
Method 1 + + +
Method 2

Method 1 is the original method and does not result in complete hydrolysis of isoflavone and equol sulfates. Method 2 is the new method reported here which efficiently hydrolyses all the isoflavone and equol phase-2 conjugates including the sulfates. + denotes presence of compound after hydrolysis (i.e., not fully hydrolysed) and − denotes fully hydrolysed (i.e., no detectable conjugates observed after hydrolysis).