Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;19:53. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01031-6

Table 3.

Multivariable analyses between possible predictors and silent brain infarct/white matter hyperintensity volume using HOMA-IR instead of TyG index

Silent brain infarct White matter hyperintensity
Adjusted OR (95% CI) P-value β (95% CI) P-value
Age 1.09 [1.07–1.11] < 0.001 0.054 (0.049 to 0.059) < 0.001
Sex, male 0.87 [0.63–1.22] 0.426 0.023 (− 0.063 to 0.109) 0.601
Body mass index 0.99 [0.94–1.05] 0.816 − 0.012 (− 0.027 to 0.003) 0.124
Use of antihypertensives 1.55 [1.07–2.25] 0.021 0.275 (0.165 to 0.384) < 0.001
Use of antiplatelet agents 0.93 [0.51–1.68] 0.801 − 0.060 (− 0.227 to 0.108) 0.484
hs-CRP* 1.03 [0.93–1.15] 0.553
WBC counts 0.029 (0.003 to 0.055) 0.031
HOMA-IR* 1.32 [1.02–1.71] 0.036 0.075 (0.013 to 0.137) 0.018

HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; WBC: white blood cell

*These variables were transformed into a log scale

This analysis used a multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted with P < 0.05 in univariate analysis (age, use of antihypertensives, use of antiplatelet agents, hs-CRP, and HOMA-IR) and sex and BMI

This analysis used a multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted with P < 0.05 in univariate analysis (age, use of antihypertensives, use of antiplatelet agents, White blood cell counts, and HOMA-IR) and sex and BMI