Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 25;2020:1751025. doi: 10.1155/2020/1751025

Table 1.

Patients' data.

3D printing and TTE group (n = 26) Conventional group (n = 27) p value
Female 17 (65.4%) 15 (55.6%) 0.858

Age (years) 18.8 ± 15.9 14.0 ± 11.6 0.217

Three defects 6 (23.1%) 4 (14.8%) 0.452

Maximum distance (mm) defect 8.0 ± 3.9 7.6 ± 3.0 0.673

Large defect distance (defined as ≥ 7 mm) 14 (53.8%) 11 (40.7%) 0.349

PFO occluder 4 (15.4%) 3 (11.1%) 0.646

Occluder replacement 1 (3.8%) 16 (59.3%) <0.0001
 Once 1 (3.8%) 8 (29.6%)
 Twice 4 (14.8%)
 Thrice 4 (14.8%)

Occluder size, empirical estimation (mm) 18.0 ± 6.0
Occluder size, 3D model estimation (mm) 26.0 ± 6.0

Occluder size for patients (mm) 26.0 ± 6.0 23.5 ± 5.4 0.968

Intraoperative residual shunt 5 (19.2%) 12 (44.4%) 0.048

Residual shunt at 6 months after procedure 2 (7.7%) 8 (29.6%) 0.042

Cost (CNY) 32960.8 ± 2018.7 41019.9 ± 13758.2 0.0047

Values are expressed as means ± SD, n (%). p=0.0007 vs occluder size on 3D model.