Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:73–88. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804766-8.00005-4

Table 5.9.

Patterns of language deficits

Component Semantic PPA Nonfluent/Agrammatic PPA Logopenic PPA

Fluency Intact with respect to rate and effort, but speech content becomes poor with circumlocution and verbal paraphasia. Naming deficits reflect semantic deficits, and do not improve when asked to describe the objects Impaired rate with increased effort and apraxia of speech Rate is often preserved, but may be reduced due to word search pauses, which is often compensated by circumlocution and phonemic paraphasia. Naming deficiencies reflect word-finding rather than semantics
Comprehension Impaired even for single words. No difficulty with grammar Single word comprehension is intact. Complex sentences and reversed clauses impaired Single word comprehension is preserved. Difficulty with complex sentences, with reversed clauses
Repetition Preserved for single words and simple sentences. As the semantic content increases, repetition declines Preserved Repetition is variable, and tends to be worse with longer sentences, rather than grammar complexity
Reading/Writing Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia (write “no” instead of “know”) Grammar deficits Preserved