Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;152(5):e201912533. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201912533

Table 1. Apparent affinities for nucleotide binding of nvTRPM2 N- and C-terminal sites.

Ligand Km for nvNUDT9-H (µM) EC50 (IC50) for nvTRPM2(µM) EC50 (IC50) for hsTRPM2 (µM)
ADPR 4.1 ± 0.6 2.3 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.1 (Tóth et al., 2015)
dADPR 5.7 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 0.3 n.d.
Br-ADPR 3.4 ± 0.4 31.9 ± 2.8 n.d.
ε-ADPR 19.6 ± 2.6 (IC50) 269 ± 91 (IC50) 112 ± 24 (Iordanov et al., 2016)
ADPR-2′-phosphate 14.9 ± 4.0 0.42 ± 0.04 13 ± 1 (Tóth et al., 2015)

Km values of the isolated nvNUDT9-H domain for hydrolysis of various ADPR analogues (left column), and EC50 for nvTRPM2 channel activation (for ε-ADPR IC50 for inhibition) by the same nucleotides in the presence of 125 µM cytosolic Ca2+ (center column). Data represent mean ± SEM obtained from least-squares fits of the Michaelis–Menten (Km) or Hill (EC50) equation to the respective dose–response curves. Right column lists published EC50 (IC50) values for activation (inhibition) of hsTRPM2 by ADPR analogues; to allow meaningful comparison, only reports that were obtained in inside-out patches, in the presence of saturating cytosolic Ca2+, are listed. n.d., not determined.