Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;20:268. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02960-6

Table 4.

Process evaluation: Context

Baseline Endline
Intervention n (%) Control n (%) Intervention n (%) Control n (%)
Community based organisation activities
 Pregnant women’s group (Centre for Community Development Nepal (CCDN)) 16 25 78 81
 Women’s group (District government Women and Children Office) 11 34 60 124
 Health Management Committee strengthening (CCDN) 0 0 3 6
FCHV status
 18–35 66 (46) 110 (54) 100 (52) 103 (50)
 36–55 85 (49) 102 (36) 88 (46) 86 (42)
 55 and above 9 (5) 21 (10) 4 (2) 17 (8)
 Illiterate 48 (28) 59 (29) 42 (22) 18 (9)
 Functioning FCHV women’s group 133 (65) 160 (78) 191 (94) 159 (77)
HMC status
 Received an orientation of their roles and responsibilities 8 (38) 7 (31) 20 (95) 16 (72)
 The VDC secretary was chairperson 11 (52) 10 (46) 9 (43) 14 (64)
 Conducted regular meetings 7 (33) 8 (36) 13 (62) 11 (50)
 HMC had conducted a community interaction programme 1 (5.6) 0 (0) 12 (57) 6 (27)
 Initiated at least four activities in the past year 10 (48) 8 (36) 17 (80) 16 (72)
 HMC meetings not run because of absent members 4 (19) 7 (32)
 Absence of all or some members from HMC meeting due to personal workload 8 (38) 8 (36) 13 (62) 13 (59)
Health workers involved in delivery services
 Doctor 2 2 2 2
 Staff nurse 1 2 1 2
 ANM 17 20 33 33
 MCHW 16 15 14 12
Health workers with SBA training
 Staff nurse 1
 ANM 1 1 8 7
 MCHW 2 1
Vacant Posts
 Staff nurse 1 1
 ANM 1 1 2
 MCHW 2 1
Nurses on short term contracts
 ANM (DHO recruited) 4 3 13 14
 ANM (HMC recruited) 7 10 9 6
Health facilities providing 24 h delivery care 6 7 17 15
Inj Magnesium Sulphate 2 cc/1 g (for eclampsia treatment) 8 6 13 13
Placenta pit 0 0 7 9
Private clinic or medical shop 38 63 55 68