Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;20:133. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01232-z

Table 2.

2 L chemotherapy

Therapy, n (%)a Australia (N = 34) Canada (N = 100) Italy (N = 84) UK (N = 62) Overall (N = 280)
Monotherapy 20 (58.8%) 48 (48.0%) 38 (45.2%) 39 (62.9%) 145 (51.8%)
Combination therapyb 14 (41.2%) 52 (52.0%) 46 (54.8%) 23 (37.1%) 135 (48.2%)
 Doublet chemotherapy 10 (71.4%) 39 (75.0%) 38 (82.6%) 15 (65.2%) 102 (75.6%)
 Triplet chemotherapy 4 (28.6%) 13 (25.0%) 8 (17.4%) 7 (30.4%) 32 (23.7%)
Monotherapyc
 Taxanes 10 (50.0%) 23 (47.9%) 29 (76.3%) 38 (97.4%) 100 (69.0%)
 Irinotecan 6 (30.0%) 21 (43.8%) 4 (10.5%) 1 (2.6%) 32 (22.1%)
 Fluoropyrimidines 2 (10.0%) 3 (6.3%) 1 (2.6%) - 6 (4.1%)
 Ramucirumab - 1 (2.1%) 3 (7.9%) - 4 (2.8%)
 Platinum 1 (5.0%) - 1 (2.6%) - 2 (1.4%)
 Other monotherapy 1 (5.0%) - - - 1 (0.7%)
Doublet chemotherapyc
 Fluoropyrimidine + irinotecan 2 (14.3%) 25 (48.1%) 18 (39.1%) - 45 (33.3%)
 Fluoropyrimidine + platinum 5 (35.7%) 6 (11.5%) 4 (8.7%) 9 (39.1%) 24 (17.8%)
 Taxanes + ramucirumab - 2 (3.8%) 10 (21.7%) 1 (4.3%) 13 (9.6%)
 Taxanes + trastuzumab - - 3 (6.5%) 2 (8.7%) 5 (3.7%)
 Other doublet 3 (21.4%) 6 (11.5%) 3 (6.5%) 3 (13.0%) 15 (11.1%)
Triplet chemotherapyc
 Fluoropyrimidine + platinum + anthracycline 4 (28.6%) 5 (9.6%) 3 (6.5%) 3 (13.0%) 15 (11.1%)
 Fluoropyrimidine + platinum + other - 8 (15.4%) 5 (10.9%) 2 (8.7%) 15 (11.1%)
 Other triplet - - - 2 (8.7%) 2 (1.5%)

a Specific drugs used are tabulated in the supplementary material

b Percentages receiving doublet and triplet are out of number of patients who received combination therapy

c Percentages for individual regimens are out of number of patients who received monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively