Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Antiviral Res. 2017 Oct 31;148:20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.10.021

Table 1.

Efficacy of oseltamivir treatment of immunocompetent and immunosuppressed BALB/c mice inoculated with a lethal dose of influenza BR/08 virus.

Oseltamivir dose (mg/kg/d)a No. of treatment days No. of surviving mice/total no. of mice (%) Mean day to death ± SD Mean weight loss (% ± SD) on dpi:b Lung virus titer (mean ± SD) (log10QTCID50/ml) on dpi:c
6 10 14 6 10 14
Immunocompetent mice
0 8 0/5 (0) 8.6 ± 0.9 25.7 ± 1.3 NA NA 3.5 ± 0.0 NA NA
20 8 4/5 (80) 18.6 ± 5.4* 17.4 ± 0.9 14.6 ± 2.0 3.1 ± 0.9 2.5 ± 0.7 < <
Immunosuppressed mice
0 8 0/5 (0) 7.4 ± 0.9 21.2 ± 2.6 NA NA 2.6 ± 1.2 NA NA
20 8 0/5 (0) 9.5 ± 1.6* 13.6 ± 1.9 17.9 ± 1.2 NA 3.5 ± 0.0 4.1 ± 0.4 4.5 ± 0.1
20 16 1/5 (20) 13.8 ± 4.4* 11.9 ± 1.5 19.8 ± 2.2 24.8 ± 1.5 3.2 ± 0.4 3.5 ± 0.0 <
a

Oseltamivir was administered by oral gavage at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day (0.1 mL/mouse) twice daily for 8 (immunocompetent mice) or for 8 or16 (immunosuppressed mice) days. Control (virus-inoculated, untreated) mice received sterile water.

b

Loss of weight was calculated for each mouse as a percentage of its weight on day 0.

c

Virus titers were determined in the lungs of mice (n = 3/group/time-point) at 6, 10, and 14 dpi by TCID50 assays in MDCK cells.

<

, virus not detected by the TCID50 assay (detection limit was 1.0 log10TCID50/mL).

*

P < 0.01 for comparisons of untreated and oseltamivir-treated mice inoculated with BR/08 virus by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-test. NA, not applicable (all mice in the group died).