Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 28;2016(7):CD004598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004598.pub4

Zeng 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT, parallel
Participants N = 60
Age range: 38‐71
Sex: 42 males
Shoulder‐hand syndrome following stroke
Diagnostic criteria not reported
Duration of symptoms; described as "in the early stages of SHS complicated with paralysis"
Previous treatment not specified
Mean baseline pain, 0‐10 VRS (SD):
SGB + rehab group: 6.95 (3.24)
Rehab‐only group: 6.85 (3.24)
Medico‐legal factors: not reported
Concomitant treatments: not reported
Interventions Stellate ganglion block + rehabilitation versus rehabilitation only
SGB: anterior entry, transverse process of C7, agent, dose not reported
Rehabiliation details: reports "comprehensive treatment" eliminating causes of oedema, avoid weight loading of limb, avoid limb trauma, remove factors causing shoulder pain, movement exercises, joint mobilisations, ice therapy, physical therapy
Outcomes Pain VAS (0 = no pain, 2 = little pain, 4 = frequent mild pain or occasional severe pain, 6 = severe pain but tolerable, 8 = continuous pain and intolerable, 10 = severe pain that couldn't be touched).
Pain was measured before treatment, at 10 days and 20 days post‐treatment
Country of origin China
Study aim Effect of stellate ganglion is observed on base of comprehensive rehabilitation treatment (sic)
Notes No statement of financial support or conflict of interest; adverse events not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomly divided into two groups"
Comment: method of randomisation not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Index and control groups are not indistinguishable and success of blinding was not tested
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Participant‐rated outcomes; participants not blinded (as above)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No drop‐outs
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes adequately reported on
Adequate sample size? High risk N = 60 (30 in each group)
Adequate duration of follow‐up? Unclear risk 20 days follow‐up
Free of other bias? Low risk Quote: "All patients were in early stage of SHS complicated with paralysis"; "there weren't statistical differences at age, sex, rehabilitation kind"
Comments: no difference between groups in age, sex, rehabilitation and duration of symptoms; outcome assessment timing identical

ARR: absolute risk reduction; BTA: botulinum toxin A; CIBP: continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block; CRPS: complex regional pain syndrome; CSG: continuous stellate ganglion block; IASP: International Association for the Study of Pain;IV: intravenous; IVRB: intravenous regional blockade; LASB: local anaesthetic sympathetic blockade; NNTB: number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome; PRF: pulsed radiofrequency; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RSD: reflex sympathetic dystrophy; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; SF‐36: 36‐item short‐form health survey; SGB: stellate ganglion blockade; SMP: sympathetically maintained pain; VAS: visual analogue scale; VRS: verbal report scale.