Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;10:594. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00594

Table 4.

Physicians' characteristics and their CAM knowledge according to their specialty.

Characteristics Specialty group
G1 Oncology, hematology, pain management, radiotherapy, anaesthesiology G2 Internal medicine, geriatric medicine, infectious diseases G3 Surgical specialties G4 Nuclear medicine, no specialization, other
No. (%) No. (%) p-value 1* No. (%) p-value 2* No. (%) p-value 3*
Gender 0.5 0.06 0.2
Female 88 (49.7) 59 (53.2) 24 (36.4) 49 (58.3)
Male 89 (50.3) 52 (46.8) 42 (63.6) 35 (41.7)
Age 0.001 0.6 0.6
<40 years 66 (37.3) 66 (59.5) 29 (43.9) 28 (33.3)
40–65 years 107 (60.5) 43 (38.7) 35 (53) 55 (65.5)
65 years 4 (2.3) 2 (1.8) 2 (3) 1 (1.2)
Time elapsed since specialization <0.0001 0.1 0.5
<5 years 39 (23.2) 51 (52.6) 8 (16.7) 20 (23.8)
5–10 years 36 (21.4) 5 (5.2) 6 (12.5) 23 (27.4)
≥10 years 93 (55.4) 41 (42.3) 34 (70.8) 41 (48.8)
Workplace location <0.0001 0.8 0.8
Northern Italy 61 (34.5) 17 (15.3) 21 (31.8) 26 (31)
Central Italy 20 (11.3) 9 (8.1) 7 (10.6) 11 (13.1)
Southern Italy 96 (54.2) 85 (76.6) 38 (57.6) 47 (56)
Institution <0.0001 <0.0001 0.004
Research hospital 75 (42.4) 8 (7.2) 15 (22.7) 36 (42.9)
University 47 (26.6) 72 (64.9) 39 (59.1) 36 (42.9)
General hospital 55 (31.1) 31 (27.9) 12 (18.2) 12 (14.3)
Are you involved in research activity? 0.001 0.9 0.9
Yes 106 (59.9) 44 (39.6) 40 (60.6) 50 (59.5)
No 71 (40.1) 67 (60.4) 26 (39.4) 34 (40.5)
Do you know what CAM stands for? 0.01 0.1 0.3
Yes 102 (57.6) 47 (42.3) 31 (47) 43 (51.2)
No 75 (42.4) 64 (57.7) 35 (53) 41 (48.8)
Have you ever heard about alternative and complementary medicine? <0.0001 0.03 0.001
Yes 154 (88) 78 (70.3) 50 (76.9) 60 (71.4)
No 21 (12) 33 (29.7) 15 (23.1) 24 (28.6)
Should patients be treated exclusively with CM? 0.1 0.06 0.02
Yes 58 (32.8) 41 (36.9) 32 (48.5) 28 (33.3)
No 92 (52) 46 (41.4) 24 (36.4) 32 (38.1)
I don't know 27 (15.3) 24 (21.6) 10 (15.2) 24 (28.6)
Do you suggest CAM to your patients? 0.2 0.3 0.6
Yes 102 (57.6) 55 (49.5) 33 (50) 51 (60.7)
No 75 (42.4) 56 (50.5) 33 (50) 33 (39.3)
Do you discuss CAM use with your patients? 0.2 0.1 0.1
Yes 87 (49.2) 51 (45.9) 25 (37.9) 30 (35.7)
No 74 (41.8) 55 (49.5) 37 (56.1) 46 (54.8)
I don't know 16 (9) 5 (4.5) 4 (6.1) 8 (9.5)
Could CAM have a role in CM? 0.005 0.3 0.09
Yes 86 (48.6) 37 (33.3) 26 (39.4) 34 (40.5)
No 33 (18.6) 38 (34.2) 18 (27.3) 11 (13.1)
I don't know 58 (32.8) 36 (32.4) 22 (33.3) 39 (46.4)
CAM could play a role as: 0.9 0.4 0.3
Alternative medicine 11 (6.2) 10 (9) 2 (3) 4 (4.8)
Complementary therapy 88 (49.7) 55 (49.5) 34 (51.5) 42 (50)
Integrated medicine 40 (22.6) 26 (23.4) 18 (27.3) 23 (27.4)
I don't know 38 (21.5) 20 (18) 12 (18.2) 15 (17.9)
CAM use by participants 0.7 0.6 0.7
Yes 43 (25.9) 27 (25.5) 19 (31.7) 23 (31.9)
No 123 (74.1) 79 (74.5) 41 (68.3) 49 (68.1)
*

P1; P2; P3: p-values of Pearson's chi-square test comparing G1 physicians with G2 physicians (P1); with G2 physicians (P2); and with G3 physicians (P3).

Bold values indicate statistically significant p-value.