Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;35(6):935–947. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10115-0

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Study Year Country Study design N Age (y)
Mean (SD)*
Patient diagnoses Tracheostomy manipulation Swallow outcomes
Instrumentation Measures
Amathieu et al. [41] 2012 France Case series 12 37.0 Traumaa Cuffb EMG and accelerometry Quantitative
Davis et al. [46] 2002 USA Case series 12 60.0 Medical, respiratoryc Cuffd VFSS Impairment
Elpern et al. [48] 2000 USA Case series 15 60.1 (14.4) Cardiothoracic, medical, neurogenic, trauma, respiratorye Valvef VFSS Impairment
Donzelli et al. [42] 2006 USA TCase series 40 62.8 (12.0) Medical, neurogenic, respiratoryg Occlusionh FEES Impairment
Leder [39] 1999 USA Case series 20 68.0 (13.0) Cardiothoracic, medical, neurogenic, surgical, trauma, respiratoryi Valvef FEES Impairment
Leder et al. [40] 2001 USA Case series 11 64.3 (15.4) Medical, respiratoryj Occlusionk Manometry Quantitative
Leder et al. [43] 1996 USA Case series 19 61.0 (21.0) Cardiothoracic, medical, neurogenic, respiratoryl Occlusionm VFSS Impairment
Ledl and Ullrich [45] 2017 Germany Case series 20 61.5 (12.8) Neurogenicn Occlusionm FEES and manometry Impairment; quantitative
Ohmae et al. [47] 2006 Japan Case series 16 67.3 (13.0) Respiratory, medical, cardiothoracico Valvef FEES and VFSS Impairment; quantitative
Suiter et al. [44] 2003 USA Case series 18 19–80 (range) Cardiothoracic, neurogenic, respiratoryp Cuff, valveq VFSS Impairment; quantitative

ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome; CABG coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CHF congestive heart failure; COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA cerebral vascular accident; EMG electromyography; FEES fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; MVA motor vehicle accident; N patients who meet inclusion criteria for this review; PNA pneumonia; SD standard deviation; VFSS videofluoroscopic swallowing study; y year

aThoracic/abdominal. bCuff pressure variations: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, and 60 cm H2O. cMulti-organ failure, sepsis, ARDS, pneumonia. dInflation/deflation comparison. eMultiple trauma, CABG, CVA, CHF, PNA, lung cancer, smoke inhalation, COPD. f ± one-way speaking valve. gHeart failure, CVA, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, respiratory failure. hDigital occlusion, one-way speaking valve, cap. iThoracic aortic aneurysm, post-operative CVA, adult-onset diabetes, perforated duodenal ulcer repair, MVA, cancer, CVA, nephrectomy, hemicolectomy, esophagectomy, bowel resection, incarcerated hernia repair, ARDS, Legionnaire’s disease, respiratory failure. jCHF, subglottic stenosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, cardiac arrest, PNA, COPD, ARDS. k ± digital occlusion. lCoronary artery disease, colon cancer, necrotic left lung, human immunodeficiency virus, MVA, liver cirrhosis, cancer, assault/multiple facial and non-facial trauma, quadriplegia, CVA, PNA, ARDS, COPD, cardio-pulmonary disease. m ± occlusion (method unspecified). nCVA. oRespiratory failure, pharyngeal edema, heart failure. pCABG, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, closed head injury, COPD, ARDS. qCuff inflation vs. deflation, cuff inflation vs. one-way speaking valve, cuff deflation vs. one-way speaking valve

*Unless otherwise stated

13 patients did not receive FEES following speaking valve removal therefore this FEES data not included herein