Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;6(1):e000683. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000683

Table 3.

EMG methodological quality evaluation

Article reference
Domain De Mey et al53 Hardwick et al54 Kaur et al55 Kibler et al56 Maenhout et al57 Maenhout et al58 Nagai et al59 Nakamura et al52 Smith et al60 Tsuruike and Ellenbecker61 Uhl et al62 Yamauchi et al63
EMG detection of signal 4.00 3.50 4.00 3.75 4.75 4.75 4.80 4.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 4.50
Processing signals 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
Evaluation of EMG levels/patterns 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Evaluation of EMG timing N/A N/A N/A 1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Procedures 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0
Analysis 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total scores 10.00 7.50 10.00 9.75 10.75 10.75 9.8 10.75 7.75 8.75 7.75 10.50
% Quality scores 83% 62% 83% 75% 90% 90% 82% 90% 64% 73% 64% 88%

Shades of grey for visual between-study comparison only: Inline graphic, ≤70%; Inline graphic, ≥70%–79%; Inline graphic, ≥80%.

EMG, electromyography; N/A, not assessed.