Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;20:550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3

Table 1.

Characteristics of Tweets about Ebola

Full Data Set Data Set Without Jokes
Descriptive Qualities Frequency (N) Frequency (N)
Tweet Interpreted as a joke 21% (653) N/A
Tweet Contains News Headline 7% (204) 8% (204)
Tweet Shares True Information 31% (953) 38% (941)
Tweet Shares Half-true Information/ Misrepresents the truth 4% (128) 5% (120)
Tweet Shares False Information 4% (134) 5% (125)
Unable to ascertain the Truth in Tweet 12% (365) 15% (363)
Tweet Shares an Opinion 42% (1318) 52% (1286)
Tweet Designed to Promote Discord/ Evoke a Response 22% (696) 28% (689)
Political Content
 Content of Tweet Political in Nature 21% (644) 25% (625)
 Sentiments in Support of Gov <  1% (11) < 1% (11)
 Sentiments in Opposition of Gov 11% (352) 14% (343)
Risk Frames
 Tweet Contains Risk Elevating Message 35% (1077) 42% (1045)
 Tweet Contains Risk Minimizing Message 12% (365) 14% (355)
Ebola Specific Content
 Tweet Shares Sentiments Related to Health 60% (1863) 72% (1768)
 Tweet Mentions Medical Counter Measures 2% (71) 3% (64)
 Tweet Mentions Fatal Nature of Ebola 7% (213) 8% (200)
 Tweet Mentions the Spread of the Outbreak 30% (929) 35% (854)
 Tweet Mentions the Reduction of the Outbreak 4% (109) 4% (107)
 Tweet Mentions Travel Ban/Closing Border 2% (70) 3% (70)
 Tweet Mentioned Quarantine/Isolation 3% (104) 4% (102)
 Tweet Mentioned Screen/ Fever Check at Airports 1% (31) 1% (30)
 Tweet Mentioned Public Health Monitoring 1% (38) 2% (38)
 Percentage of Tweets Mentioning at Least One of Prior Categories 44% (1365) 61% (1267)
Ebola Rumors
 Tweets that Mention a Rumor 7% (227) 8% (205)
 Tweets that Refute a Rumor 1% (45) 2% (43)
Number of Tweets 3113 2460

Table 1: The full dataset (n = 3113 tweets) contained all included tweets related to Ebola. The dataset without jokes (n = 2460) excluded all tweets coded as jokes to further focus analysis on Ebola-specific tweet content.