Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;58(4):636–646. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.09.029

Table 3.

STARD Criteria with Highest Adherence (80% or more)

STARD CRITERIA Reported Accuracy n = 29 (64, 49 – 78) Did Not Report Accuracy n = 16 (36, 22 – 51) All Articles N = 45
n (%, 95% CI) n (%, 95% CI) n (%, 95% CI)
2. State the research questions or aims, such as estimating diagnostic accuracy or comparing accuracy between tests or across participant groups 29 (100, 88 – 100) 16 (100, 79 – 100) 45 (100, 92 – 100)
3. Describe the study population: the inclusion and exclusion criteria and the settings and locations where the data were collected 27 (93, 77 – 99) 14 (88, 62 – 98) 41 (91, 79 – 98)
6. Describe data collection: was data collection planned before the index tests and reference standard were performed (prospective study) or after (retrospective study)? 26 (90, 73 – 98) 11 (67, 41 – 89) 37 (82, 68 – 92)
8. Describe technical specifications of material and methods involved, including how and when measurements were taken, or cite references for index tests or reference standard, or both 28 (97, 82 – 100) 12 (75, 48 – 93) 40 (89, 76 – 96)
9. Describe definition of and rationale for the units, cutoff points, or categories of the results of the index tests and the reference standard 27 (93, 77 – 99) 9 (56, 30 – 80) 36 (80, 65 – 90)
14. Report when study was done, including beginning and ending dates of recruitment 23 (79, 60 – 92) 13 (81, 54 – 96) 36 (80, 65 – 90)
25. Discuss the clinical applicability of the study findings 29 (100, 88 – 100) 16 (100, 79 – 100) 45 (100, 92 – 100)