Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Genet. 2020 Feb 8;50(3):139–151. doi: 10.1007/s10519-020-09994-8

Table 4:

Results of Measurement Invariance Tests with Externalizing Psychopathology Model

Model −2LL df est. par. AIC BIC χ2 LRT diff df p
Base 24,504.2 16,288 36 −8,071.8 −107,242.3 131.1 - - -
Weak 25,505.1 16,291 36 −8,076.9 −107,265.7 132.0 0.89 3 .83
Strong 24,506.3 16,291 33 −8,075.7 −107.264.5 133.2 2.03 3 .57
Biometric 24,505.8 16,291 33 −8.076.2 −107,264.9 132.8 1.61 3 .66
Biometric and Strong 24,507.7 16,294 30 −8080.3 −107,287.3 134.7 3.51 6 .74
Strict 24,564.6 16,300 24 −8.035.4 −107,278.9 191.6 60.40 12 1.9 × 10−8

Note: Base model is the single factor model. Biometric invariance constrains the factor variance components to be equivalent between states. −2LL = log likelihood; df = degrees of freedom for model where the number of estimated parameters is subtracted from the total number of observations (N individuals multiplied by n non-missing symptom counts); est. par. = Estimated Parameters; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion; LRT = Likelihood Ratio Test, diff df= degrees of freedom for LRT. Best fitting model (by AIC and BIC) is bolded.