Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;4:28. doi: 10.1186/s41747-020-00154-5

Table 1.

Multiexponenatial T2 analysis

Phantom study
Phantom samples Mono/biexponential prevalence (%) A1 ± SD (a.u.) T21 ± SD (ms) A2 ± SD (a.u.) T22 ± SD (ms)
Acetone 98/2 532 ± 20 2,231 ± 206
Double distilled water 97/3 893 ± 24 1,716 ± 240
Milk cream 35% 0/100 519 ± 218 41 ± 16 794 ± 236 240 ± 55
Milk cream 20% 5/95 339 ± 246 44 ± 24 871 ± 261 304 ± 66
Milk cream 15% 10/90 409 ± 352 46 ± 26 830 ± 374 411 ± 48
Milk cream 12% 15/85 1,012 ± 47 200 ± 13
313 ± 208 57 ± 35 764 ± 225 349 ± 64
One white, three yolks 10/90 1,115 ± 43 91 ± 2
518 ± 141 46 ± 10 674 ± 152 177 ± 23
Three whites, one yolk 40/60 1,021 ± 48 258 ± 5
169 ± 115 47 ± 33 910 ± 154 317 ± 50
One white, one yolk 91/9 1,511 ± 71 65 ± 2
One yolk 0/100 980 ± 36 30 ± 2 43 ± 15 236 ± 20
Corn oil 0/100 666 ± 183 40 ± 12 1,044 ± 10 193 ± 33
One white 60/40 1,034 ± 31 339 ± 7
123 ± 74 50 ± 33 954 ± 86 395 ± 62

a.u. Arbitrary units, A1 Relative amplitude of the short T2 component, A2 Relative amplitude of the long T2 component, T21 Short relaxation time, T22 Long relaxation time, SD Standard deviation