Figure 5.

Duration of the tasks sequence during the familiarization and the performance evaluation sessions, after static and dynamic data acquisition. (A) Performance of all the participants. Although the task completion time decreased significantly after the initial familiarization (^**p < 0.01), the performance of static and dynamic data acquisition remained comparable both during the familiarization and the following evaluation session. This trend characterized the performance of (B) naive participants but not those of (C) experienced participants, for whom the average session duration did not change significantly across acquisition strategies and familiarization levels. The performance of the naive participants rapidly converged to those of the experienced ones, despite retaining a higher variance. (D,E) Chronological evolution of the performance of the naive subjects, divided between those who first tested the static and then the dynamic condition, and vice versa. The improvement of all the naive subjects was consistent, not only within the same training strategy but also across different strategies (^*p < 0.05). For groups with fewer than five samples, we show the individual data points rather than a boxplot.