Skip to main content
. 2020 May;121:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.007

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of 127 reviews of comparative accuracy and multiple tests

Characteristic Comparative reviews
Multiple test reviews Total
Statistical test performed to compare accuracy
Yes No or uncleara
Number of reviews 53 (42) 29 (23) 45 (35) 127
Year of publication
 2008 14 (26) 11 (38) 13 (29) 38 (30)
 2009 6 (11) 10 (34) 8 (18) 24 (19)
 2010 16 (30) 4 (14) 11 (24) 31 (24)
 2011 13 (25) 3 (10) 7 (16) 23 (18)
 2012b 4 (8) 1 (3) 6 (13) 11 (9)
Type of publication
 Cochrane review 3 (6) 1 (3) 1 (2) 5 (4)
 General medical journal 5 (9) 5 (17) 13 (29) 23 (18)
 Specialist medical journal 42 (79) 22 (76) 30 (64) 93 (73)
 Technology assessment report 3 (6) 1 (3) 2 (4) 6 (5)
Number of tests evaluated
 2 20 (38) 14 (48) 12 (27) 46 (36)
 3 12 (23) 6 (21) 4 (9) 22 (17)
 4 8 (15) 3 (10) 4 (9) 15 (12)
 ≥5 13 (25) 6 (21) 25 (56) 44 (35)
Clinical topic (according to ICD-11 Version: 2018)
 Circulatory system 9 (17) 5 (17) 5 (11) 19 (15)
 Digestive system 3 (6) 1 (3) 8 (18) 12 (9)
 Infectious and parasitic diseases 3 (6) 4 (14) 9 (20) 16 (13)
 Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes 2 (4) 1 (3) 2 (4) 5 (4)
 Mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental disorders 2 (4) 1 (3) 3 (7) 6 (5)
 Musculoskeletal system and connective tissue 1 (2) 1 (3) 4 (9) 6 (5)
 Neoplasms 28 (53) 12 (41) 7 (16) 47 (37)
 Other ICD-11 codesc 5 (9) 4 (14) 7 (16) 16 (13)
Type of tests evaluated
 Biopsy 0 1 (3) 0 1 (1)
 Clinical and physical examination 5 (9) 3 (10) 15 (33) 23 (18)
 Device 1 (2) 0 0 1 (1)
 Imaging 32 (60) 13 (45) 9 (20) 54 (43)
 Laboratory 8 (15) 8 (28) 12 (27) 28 (22)
 RDT or POCT 1 (2) 0 4 (9) 5 (4)
 Self-administered questionnaire 1 (2) 1 (3) 0 2 (2)
 Combinations of any of the aboved 5 (9) 3 (10) 5 (11) 13 (10)
Clinical purpose of the tests
 Diagnostic 42 (79) 23 (79) 44 (98) 109 (86)
 Monitoring 1 (2) 1 (3) 0 2 (2)
 Prognostic/prediction 0 1 (3) 0 1 (1)
 Response to treatment 1 (2) 0 0 1 (1)
 Screening 3 (6) 4 (14) 1 (2) 8 (6)
 Staging 6 (11) 0 0 6 (5)
Number of test accuracy studies in reviews
 Median (range) 25 (6–103) 17 (5–82) 19 (3–79) 20 (3–103)
 Interquartile range 14–43 11–32 12–24 12–34
Number of comparative studies
 Median (range) 7 (0–59) 6 (0–32) 4 (0–52) 6 (0–59)
 Interquartile range 4–14 1–11 2–10 3–11
Number of noncomparative studies
 Median (range) 17 (0–98) 6 (0–79) 10 (0–76) 14 (0–98)
 Interquartile range 6–32 0–27 5–20 3–24

Abbreviations: ICD-11, International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision; RDT, rapid diagnostic test; POCT, point of care test.

Numbers in parentheses are column percentages unless otherwise stated. Percentages may not add up to 100% because of rounding.

a

In 3 reviews, it was unclear whether a statistical comparison of test accuracy was done.

b

Includes only studies published up to October 2012.

c

Includes 8 ICD-11 codes that had fewer than 5 reviews across the 3 groups.

d

Tests evaluated in a review were not of the same type.