Skip to main content
. 2020 May;121:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.007

Table 3.

Investigations of heterogeneity in comparative and multiple test reviews

Characteristic Comparative reviews
Multiple test reviews Total
Statistical analyses to compare test accuracy
Yes No or unclear
Number of reviewsa 53 (42) 29 (23) 45 (35) 127 (100)
Formal investigation performed
 Yes—meta-regression and subgroup analyses 5 (9) 1 (3) 2 (4) 8 (6)
 Yes—meta-regression 15 (28) 5 (17) 4 (9) 24 (19)
 Yes—subgroup analyses 13 (25) 8 (28) 14 (31) 35 (28)
 No—limited data 8 (15) 2 (7) 1 (2) 11 (9)
 No—only tested for heterogeneity 3 (6) 8 (28) 16 (36) 27 (21)
 No—nothing reported 7 (13) 5 (17) 8 (18) 20 (16)
 Unclear 2 (4) 0 0 2 (2)
If yes above, was effect on relative accuracy also investigated?
 Yes 5 (15) 0 0 5 (15)
 No 21 (64) 0 0 21 (64)
 Planned but no data 1 (3) 0 0 1 (3)
 Unclear 6 (18) 0 0 6 (18)

Numbers in parentheses are column percentages unless otherwise stated. Percentages may not add up to 100% because of rounding.

a

Numbers in parentheses are row percentages.