Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;20:140. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01219-w

Table 3.

Favourable and unfavourable viral outcomes by drug category

Favourable outcomesa
n. of events (% of total outcomes by drug)
Unfavourable outcomes
n. of events (% of total outcomes by drug)
Drugs Individuals
n (% of total)
Individuals with 2 events Fully suppressed (undetectable for study period) Fully suppressed (became undetectable) Transient rise Adequate viral suppression Total favourable outcomes Viral breakthrough 1 log10 rise Non-transient rise Not suppressed Total unfavourable outcomes
All 642 40 340(48.85) 179(26.25) 55(8.06) 47(6.89) 621(91.06) 17(2.49) 42(6.54) 2(< 0.01%) 61(8.94)
First line therapy
 Entecavir 0.5 mg 407(63.40) 22 216(50.35) 118(27.21) 35(8.16) 27(3.96) 396(92.31) 8(1.86) 24(5.90) 1(<.01%) 33(7.69)
 Tenofovir 143(22.27) 11 61(39.61) 48(31.17) 10(6.49) 19(2.79) 138(89.61) 6(3.90) 9 (6.29) 1(< 0.01%) 16(10.39)
Other
 Entecavir 1 mg 29(4.52) 1 16(53.33) 2(10.00) 6(20.00) 1(3.33) 26(86.67) 2(6.67) 2(6.90) 0(0.00) 4(13.33)
Older drugs
 Lamivudine 53(8.26) 4 40(70.18) 8(14.04) 4(7.02) 0(0.00) 52(91.23) 1(1.75) 4(7.54) 0(0.00) 5(8.77)
 Adefovir 10(1.56) 1 7(58.33) 2(20.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 9(75.00) 0(0.00) 3(25.00) 0(0.00) 3(25.00)

aSee Table 1 for definition of favourable and unfavourable outcomes