Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;16:124. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02350-2

Table 2.

Effects of four different centrifugation forces for one-step platelet-rich plasma preparation with and without carprofen (N = 12)

Force, xg Platelet concentration, X 103 cell/μl Platelet fold-increase Recovery, % Coefficient of variance, %
Without carprofena
 300 391.75 ± 49.55*** 2.02 ± 0.28*** 56.70 ± 5.22*** 0.82
 500 328.17 ± 55.36*** 1.74 ± 0.16*** 69.87 ± 3.84*** 1.38
 700 290.75 ± 56.69* 1.54 ± 0.17* 83.00 ± 4.70** 1.70
 900 260.13 ± 44.85 1.38 ± 0.12 88.66 ± 3.49 1.71
With carprofenb
 300 1556.10 ± 339.55*** 8.19 ± 0.84*** 89.39 ± 7.08*** 1.87
 500 948.50 ± 261.40 4.95 ± 0.76 97.80 ± 1.72 1.78
 700 552.29 ± 187.22*** 2.87 ± 0.63*** 86.19 ± 2.71*** 2.42
 900 447.13 ± 116.64*** 2.34 ± 0.33*** 82.80 ± 3.88*** 2.23

aCompared with the optimal centrifugation force of 900 xg. b Compared with the optimal centrifugation force of 500 xg. Platelet concentration, increase and % recovery expressed as mean ± standard deviation. g = gravitational force. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 in post-hoc tests