Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;40(19):3783–3798. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2105-19.2020

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Example PEG units showing foreground enhancement of responses to repeating noise. A, Raster and PSTH data for a unit from PEG, plotted as in Figure 4. This unit had a smaller overall response to the repeating segment compared with the random segment (Go = −0.493; Gg= −0.250), indicating some neural adaptation. Despite this adaptation, this unit had a significant foreground enhancement (E = 1.308) due to the suppression of background (Gb= −1.316) but no change of foreground (Gf = −0.009). B, Same as in A for a second unit in PEG. This unit showed facilitation of the overall response (Go = 0.425; Gg = 0.104). When broken down by stream, a second PEG unit underwent foreground enhancement (E = 2.163) due to the suppression of background (Gb = −1.551) and the enhancement of foreground (Gf= 0.612). Colored dots near each unit name identify their points in Figure 6.