Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 29;2020:9592124. doi: 10.1155/2020/9592124

Table 3.

Service provision and organizational factors among pregnant women attending prenatal care at Wogera district, 2019 (n = 465).

Variables History, physical examination, or laboratory performed Frequency
n (%)
Quality of prenatal care p value
Good Poor
Current obstetric history Yes 464 (99.8) 152 312
No 1 (0.2) 0 1

Weight Yes 458 (98.5) 151 307 0.32
No 7 (1.5) 1 6

Height Yes 2 (0.4) 0 2
No 463 (99.6) 152 311

Blood pressure Yes 462 (99.4) 152 310
No 3 (0.6) 0 3

Conjunctiva of the eye examined Yes 454 (97.6) 151 303 0.23
No 11 (2.4) 1 10

Position of the baby assessed Yes 328 (70.5) 107 221 0.96
No 117 (29.5) 45 92

Fetal heart beat checked Yes 371 (79.8) 124 247 0.18
No 94 (20.2) 28 66

Edema checked Yes 142 (30.5) 133 279 0.60
No 53 (69.5) 19 34

Vaginal examination Yes 452 (97.2) 149 303 0.46
No 13 (2.8) 3 10

Hemoglobin/hematocrit Yes 208 (44.7) 105 103 0.21
No 257 (55.3) 47 210

Rapid plasma reagin Yes 315 (67.7) 144 171 0.38
No 150 (32.3) 8 142

Blood group Yes 322 (69.2) 148 174 0.45
No 143 (30.8) 4 139

Rhesus factor Yes 322 (69.2) 142 182 0.41
No 143 (30.8) 10 131

Urine analysis Yes 314 (67.5) 134 180 0.33
No 151 (32.5) 18 133

Stool examination Yes 97 (20.9) 61 36 0.27
No 368 (79.1) 91 277

Iron foliate supplementation Yes 447 (96.1) 146 301 0.95
No 18 (3.9) 6 12

Mebendazole provision Yes 133 (28.6) 131 2 0.43
No 332 (71.4) 21 211

Tetanus toxoid Yes 427 (91.8) 121 306 0.52
No 38 (8.2) 31 7